지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.10
- 수록면
- 1 - 110 (110page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study suggests systemic improvements to fully realize the right to formal trial claim of prisoners who have received a summary order, not to be misused or abused for other purposes expect for the right to a trial of prisoners. In this study, ‘the statistics related to prisoners appearance in other courts’ and ‘cases related to the formal trial claim of the prisoner’ are analyzed, in addition, ‘in-depth interview of 6 prisoners’ are used to understand the real situation.
This study findings can be summarized as follows:
First, the prisoners claiming formal trial have very high ratio of economic crimes such as fraud, embezzlement, theft, etc., and also high ratio of crimes of violence, the ratio of serious violent crimes such as murder and robbery is outstandingly low. They generally have more experiences of entering prison than average prisoners .
Second, in 134 prisoner cases sentenced penalty of formal trial, the penalty differences between summary order and formal trial are as follows: 46.7% (43 prisoners) showed no difference between the two, and about 53%, the rest of total, demonstrated decrease in penalty; 18.5% (17 prisoners), 26.1% (24 prisoners), and 8.7% (8 prisoners) of the formal trial cases have respectively decreased under KRW 500,000, KRW 500,000 to 2,000,000, and over KRW 2,010,000.
Third, the prisoners motives for claiming formal trial are mainly divided into two types, ① the motive to transfer to a different prison (1) to transfer to a desired prison, 2) to avoid being transfered to an undesired prison), and ② the motive for economic profit (1) to reduce the penalty of the summary order, 2) to delay the appointed date of payment of penalty).
Fourth, the following these are necessary to improve the formal trial claim system on summary order of the prisoners. First of all, active cooperation among the prisons, the prosecution, and the court is most effective in order to prevent the misuse or abuse of the right to a trial expect to realize the right to formal trial claim of prisoners. Second, most of the prisoners claiming formal trial have received the public notice on summary order. If the delivery system of the summary order improves, the number of claims of prisoners shall be highly decreased. Third, it is required to prevent the long distance movement for the appearance in other court of prisoners due to many abused cases for individual interest. Because the prisoners have to appear in the original court issued in the summary order even if they are subject to other prison area, many long distance movement of the prisoners claiming a formal trial leads to waste of correctional manpower and budget.
This study findings can be summarized as follows:
First, the prisoners claiming formal trial have very high ratio of economic crimes such as fraud, embezzlement, theft, etc., and also high ratio of crimes of violence, the ratio of serious violent crimes such as murder and robbery is outstandingly low. They generally have more experiences of entering prison than average prisoners .
Second, in 134 prisoner cases sentenced penalty of formal trial, the penalty differences between summary order and formal trial are as follows: 46.7% (43 prisoners) showed no difference between the two, and about 53%, the rest of total, demonstrated decrease in penalty; 18.5% (17 prisoners), 26.1% (24 prisoners), and 8.7% (8 prisoners) of the formal trial cases have respectively decreased under KRW 500,000, KRW 500,000 to 2,000,000, and over KRW 2,010,000.
Third, the prisoners motives for claiming formal trial are mainly divided into two types, ① the motive to transfer to a different prison (1) to transfer to a desired prison, 2) to avoid being transfered to an undesired prison), and ② the motive for economic profit (1) to reduce the penalty of the summary order, 2) to delay the appointed date of payment of penalty).
Fourth, the following these are necessary to improve the formal trial claim system on summary order of the prisoners. First of all, active cooperation among the prisons, the prosecution, and the court is most effective in order to prevent the misuse or abuse of the right to a trial expect to realize the right to formal trial claim of prisoners. Second, most of the prisoners claiming formal trial have received the public notice on summary order. If the delivery system of the summary order improves, the number of claims of prisoners shall be highly decreased. Third, it is required to prevent the long distance movement for the appearance in other court of prisoners due to many abused cases for individual interest. Because the prisoners have to appear in the original court issued in the summary order even if they are subject to other prison area, many long distance movement of the prisoners claiming a formal trial leads to waste of correctional manpower and budget.
목차
[표지]
[발간사]
[목차]
표 차례
그림 차례
[국문요약]
1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
2. 연구의 방법
3. 수용자 정식재판청구권 회복제도의 의의 및 문제점
4. 수용자 정식재판청구권 회복제도의 실태 분석
5. 수용자 정식재판청구권 회복제도의 개선방안
[제1장 서론]
제1절 연구의 필요성 및 목적
제2절 연구방법
[제2장 수용자 정식재판청구권 회복제도의 의의 및 문제점]
제1절 약식절차 및 정식재판청구제도
제2절 정식재판청구권 회복제도
제3절 수용자의 정식재판청구권 회복청구 및 문제점
[제3장 수용자 정식재판청구권 회복청구 관련 통계 분석 : 관외출정을 중심으로]
제1절 2014년 4-6월 교정기관 출정 현황
제2절 교정기관 고정사건 관외출정 수용자의 특성
제3절 교정기관 관외출정 고정사건의 특성
제4절 고정사건 관외출정의 비용 분석
[제4장 수용자 정식재판청구권 회복청구 관련 사례의 유형분석]
제1절 수용자 정식재판청구권 회복청구의 목적별 유형
제2절 정식재판청구권이 회복청구 된 약식명령사건 중 개선이 필요한 사례 유형
제3절 정식재판청구권 회복제도를 악용한 범법행위 유형
[제5장 수용자 정식재판청구권 회복제도의 개선방안]
제1절 개선방안에 대한 접근 태도
제2절 유관기관의 업무협조 및 실무개선
제3절 송달제도 및 송달실무의 개선방안
제4절 정식재판청구권 회복재판 관련 개선방안
제5절 정식재판청구권 회복결정 후의 정식재판 관련 개선방안
제6절 기타 개선방안
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-364-001297718