메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국발육발달학회 한국발육발달학회지 한국발육발달학회지 제20권 제4호
발행연도
2012.12
수록면
261 - 268 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recent studies (Chiviacowsky, & Wulf, 2002, 2005, 2007; Chiviacowsky et al., 2009; Badami et al., 2011, 2012) have shown that learner prefer to receive feedback after they believe they had a good rather than poor trial. The present study followed up on this finding and determined whether feedback is more effective when provided after good or relatively poor trials. The task required participants to putt golf balls to a target placed on the floor. They had no prior experience with the experimental task. Twenty-four elementary school children with a mean age of 10.4 years participated in this experiment. Participants randomly assigned to two groups with 12 participants in the ``KR on good trials`` and 12 in the ``KR on poor trials`` group. Data obtained from all subjects in six acquisition and two retention trials blocks were analyzed with two separate analyses of variance for each of four error scores. There was no differences in practice. However, on the retention test without KR, performed 1 day after the practice phase, the KR good group clearly had higher accuracy scores than the KR poor group. And analyses on the variable error indicated a significant interaction (group × block) during the retention phase. These results demonstrated that learning is facilitated if feedback is provided after good rather than poor trials.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-692-001675159