지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.1
- 수록면
- 1 - 170 (170page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The record snowfall in Seoul Metropolitan Area in January 2010 resulted in serious problems such as traffic accidents, falls on iced roads and difficulty in patient transfer due to Seoul Metropolitan Government(SMG in abbreviation)’s limited capability of snow removal and local residents’ inadequate participation.
In this study, we propose the solutions to consolidation of SMG’s snow removal capability and activation of residents’ participation. For this, we studied the current state of SMG, the global cases, the spatial analysis on the target area and the survey on residents’ recognition.
As for the heavy snowfall in January, 2010 in Seoul, SMG removed 15~30% of the total amount of snowfall in the region, leaving the rest of it. The equipment, transport capacity and manpower that are available now makes it insufficient to remove snowfall on local roads in a timely fashion. So it is needed to provide assistance on areas that are vulnerable to snow and activate residents’ participation.
Foreign cities determine the order of priority for snow removal by considering areas that are vulnerable to snow hazard based on spatial analyses on weather forecasting data, topology, nearby buildings etc and inform the workforce and residents accordingly. Also they encourage their residents’ participation in snow removal by specifying regulations on penalty for being inactive
For the selection on the vulnerable areas to snow hazard, we analysed the target areas. The factors such as slope, solar radiation, aspect and nearby important buildings were selected by the results of experts’ surveys. This enabled us to draw a conclusion on the recognition of highly vulnerable areas(covers 11% of case area) and the priorities for the concentration on the snow removal and disposal.
From the survey results on the residents’ recognition of snow removal, it was discovered that 63% of residents have thought about snow removal, however they had limited knowledge on snow removal and low awareness of duty for distributing information to nearby vulnerable areas.
For the results of this study, we present the solutions to removal and disposal of heavy snow in local roads as follows.
ⅰ) In heavy snow, SMG informs residents of the priorities about snow removal and disposal on local roads by internet and smart phone.
ⅱ) The responsibility on snow removal in multi family housings and tenement houses must be stipulated on rental contract. One site by 300~400 family must be designated as snow pile sites.
ⅲ) If the residents participate in snow removal and disposal, their time must be accepted as civil defence training or volunteer work.
ⅳ) SMG establish an ordinance requiring snow removal and penalties on homes that fail to do.
In this study, we propose the solutions to consolidation of SMG’s snow removal capability and activation of residents’ participation. For this, we studied the current state of SMG, the global cases, the spatial analysis on the target area and the survey on residents’ recognition.
As for the heavy snowfall in January, 2010 in Seoul, SMG removed 15~30% of the total amount of snowfall in the region, leaving the rest of it. The equipment, transport capacity and manpower that are available now makes it insufficient to remove snowfall on local roads in a timely fashion. So it is needed to provide assistance on areas that are vulnerable to snow and activate residents’ participation.
Foreign cities determine the order of priority for snow removal by considering areas that are vulnerable to snow hazard based on spatial analyses on weather forecasting data, topology, nearby buildings etc and inform the workforce and residents accordingly. Also they encourage their residents’ participation in snow removal by specifying regulations on penalty for being inactive
For the selection on the vulnerable areas to snow hazard, we analysed the target areas. The factors such as slope, solar radiation, aspect and nearby important buildings were selected by the results of experts’ surveys. This enabled us to draw a conclusion on the recognition of highly vulnerable areas(covers 11% of case area) and the priorities for the concentration on the snow removal and disposal.
From the survey results on the residents’ recognition of snow removal, it was discovered that 63% of residents have thought about snow removal, however they had limited knowledge on snow removal and low awareness of duty for distributing information to nearby vulnerable areas.
For the results of this study, we present the solutions to removal and disposal of heavy snow in local roads as follows.
ⅰ) In heavy snow, SMG informs residents of the priorities about snow removal and disposal on local roads by internet and smart phone.
ⅱ) The responsibility on snow removal in multi family housings and tenement houses must be stipulated on rental contract. One site by 300~400 family must be designated as snow pile sites.
ⅲ) If the residents participate in snow removal and disposal, their time must be accepted as civil defence training or volunteer work.
ⅳ) SMG establish an ordinance requiring snow removal and penalties on homes that fail to do.
목차
[표지]
[표제지]
[요약 및 정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[Ⅰ 서론]
1 연구의 배경 및 목적
2 연구의 방법 및 내용
[Ⅱ 현황 및 문제점]
1 폭설의 발생 특성
2 폭설의 피해 유형 및 현황
3 폭설 대응의 문제점 및 개선방향
4 제설 업무 현황
5 주민의 제설 참여 현황
[Ⅲ 제설업무 및 주민참여 사례]
1 제설업무 사례
2 제설 필수 및 우선 지점 선정 사례
3 주민참여 사례
[Ⅳ 대상지 분석]
1 대상지 개요
2 대상지 현황
3 대상지 취약지점 분석
[Ⅴ 주민참여 활성화 방안]
1 주민참여 활성화의 기반 마련
2 주민참여 활성화 방안
[Ⅵ 활용계획]
1 폭설 관련 정보 전달성 강화
2 제설책임 명시 및 잔설 반출 대책 수립
3 제설 주민 참여 인증
4 제설 미이행 과태료 도입
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[Abstract]
[Table of Contents]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-359-001145892