According to the futurist Alvin Toffler, the developed World has gone through two stages of societal and technological Development, the first and second waves. The first wave allowed for settlement instead of nomadic life. The second wave came with the invention or introduction of industrial technology Organizational and social change. The third wave came with the invention of microchips and information electronics. A third wave society puts premium on innovation, on speed, on precision and on an entrepreneurial attitude. Competition in this faster paced wave does not tolerate seemingly endless committee meetings and large competitive analysis: but precise analysis with much less time for deliberation. Leaders therefore develop relationships which work as a collaborative network highlighted speed, efficiency, trust, and effectiveness. The challenge for the leaders of these countries has become one of constantly evaluating the reliability, dependability and loyalty of resources and the information those resources provide for decision-making. The developing countries on the other hand are still in the first wave looking to the developed countries for donations or aid. Most concerned researchers have looked into political and corruptive ways of running the Developing countries as the causes of slow development. This paper focus on the enhancement of empowerment and a shift from the older ways (traditionalism) to more different, faster, integrative, increased social mobility, abundance and participation in the developing countries. Further it looks at valued traditionalism as a sheer lack of knowledge of external sources thus how others do it; comparing and contrasting, learning and deciding as which way could be better and be adopted. This is a matter of internal verses external sources. Internal sources may include intuitive decision making and transformational Leadership (Leaders with ideas and intelligence) to scan the environment and facilitate trends, identifications and provocative stances to be taken, good managers to run the operation to get projects moving and to find resources needed so that people can solve their own problems and take advantage of new opportunities arising out of crises and challenges, creativity and innovation. External sources include novelty to ideas, technologies, material artifacts or behavior patterns that can be borrowed or innovated by the society (internal sources). Empowerment, the expected result is simply the internal sources gaining of control over decisions, projects, programs and policies affecting them as a community (maintenance of social and economical order and correction of political misunderstandings). The Urban areas of developing countries have already seen the seed of development. These have been the most easily identifiable as needing attention and most obvious investing in major social economic and even political transformation, to ensure long term survival. The developing countries malaise is evident in know-how, social integration and social service organizations. Across the Countries, the boardrooms and mainly in the rural areas, leaders and or bureaucrats are having difficulty coping with the demands of the waves. Developing countries therefore have a long way to go. In the words of W.W.Rostow, these countries still are traditional societies. They still need to go through the pre-take-off and the take-off stages before the drive to maturity and on to high mass consumption. Leaders in the developing countries are neither intuitive nor transformational to enhance these changes. But change is inevitable them. I also assume that all leaders and all other stakeholders have the potential to be change agents and supporters of transformation if they are provided with the appropriate environment and support. For that matter, this paper looks at the potentials leading to where intuitive decision making and creative abilities can be nurtured, strengthened, enhanced and be described in such a way as to be accepted as a viable and comprehensive leadership tool for the leaders of the developing countries in order to induce their subjects to move from the state of dependency on the developed countries rendering them powerless, to self reliance, and self-respect for their own efforts, more ownership, informal education, experience, network and self-control. Potential research teams will therefore be facilitators who will work collaboratively with the people of the settings. They will also learn from the people. The people will again understand policy practices and their impacts on their countries and be able to address their needs.