개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The “Circassian question” is an important element defining the characteristic of the Caucasus war in the 19th century and contains the tragic history of an ethnic group. This article examines the “Circassian question” as a result of the Caucasus war of the 19th century, that is, studies the cause and process of large-scale Circassian migration into the Ottoman Empire from the Northwest Caucasus to 1864 after the Crimean War.
The interpretation and assessment about the 19th century the Caucasian war(the Circassian question) shows a clear different position between the central(mainly russkie scholars) and local scholars(mainly from the Caucasus regions). Russkie scholars recognize an inevitability, a harsh conquest policy in war process and Circassian’s big victim as it’s result. Also they assert that Tsar’s government had no goal of eliminating Circassians, there were important assignments of Tsar’s government policy that to keep Black Sea coast and to strengthen the new frontier of the empire in the Caucasus. Russkie scholars, emphasizing that as the most sensitive issue the cause and characteristic of Circassian migration are an outcome of Russia-Turkey-Britain interests surrounding the Northwest Caucasus, using sometimes ‘forced-muhajirun’ expressions they insist that Circassian’s migration was ‘muhajirun’. This stance doesn’t differ much from interpretation of Russian Empire period.
On the other hand, the first source cited in the text and like the Caucasus region researchers did prove in their studies, after defeat in the Crimean War Tsar’s colonial policy in the Northwest Caucasus was not differentㄴ from that of other Caucasus(Chechnya and Dagestan). There is a need to give an eye to that Circassian migration policy was implemented, in the situation that Russia already seized the chance to victory in Caucasus war. And there was not the case of driving out 90% inhabitant of the conquest of areas outside Caucasus like Circassians anywhere. Deportation has occurred frequently in history of Russia, but it is difficult to find a case of driving an ethnic group out of country. But Tsar’s government regarded Circassians as the potential risks of the northwest Caucasus region, it decided to get rid of them permanently rather than to manage the risk element. And the result was the large-scale Circassian migration into the Ottoman Empire. Therefore in spite that the Circassian migration has elements such as ‘muhajirun’, ‘forced-muhajirun’ and ‘deportation’ in fact, there are more distinctive things like ‘the deportation of an ethnic unit’ or ‘an ethnic cleansing.’
The interpretation and assessment about the 19th century the Caucasian war(the Circassian question) shows a clear different position between the central(mainly russkie scholars) and local scholars(mainly from the Caucasus regions). Russkie scholars recognize an inevitability, a harsh conquest policy in war process and Circassian’s big victim as it’s result. Also they assert that Tsar’s government had no goal of eliminating Circassians, there were important assignments of Tsar’s government policy that to keep Black Sea coast and to strengthen the new frontier of the empire in the Caucasus. Russkie scholars, emphasizing that as the most sensitive issue the cause and characteristic of Circassian migration are an outcome of Russia-Turkey-Britain interests surrounding the Northwest Caucasus, using sometimes ‘forced-muhajirun’ expressions they insist that Circassian’s migration was ‘muhajirun’. This stance doesn’t differ much from interpretation of Russian Empire period.
On the other hand, the first source cited in the text and like the Caucasus region researchers did prove in their studies, after defeat in the Crimean War Tsar’s colonial policy in the Northwest Caucasus was not differentㄴ from that of other Caucasus(Chechnya and Dagestan). There is a need to give an eye to that Circassian migration policy was implemented, in the situation that Russia already seized the chance to victory in Caucasus war. And there was not the case of driving out 90% inhabitant of the conquest of areas outside Caucasus like Circassians anywhere. Deportation has occurred frequently in history of Russia, but it is difficult to find a case of driving an ethnic group out of country. But Tsar’s government regarded Circassians as the potential risks of the northwest Caucasus region, it decided to get rid of them permanently rather than to manage the risk element. And the result was the large-scale Circassian migration into the Ottoman Empire. Therefore in spite that the Circassian migration has elements such as ‘muhajirun’, ‘forced-muhajirun’ and ‘deportation’ in fact, there are more distinctive things like ‘the deportation of an ethnic unit’ or ‘an ethnic cleansing.’
목차
1. 머리말
2. 19세기 중반 체르케스인의 오스만제국으로의 이주 배경, 과정, 성격
3. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (76)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - А.Скаков,Н.С илаев / 2010 / Черкесский фактор в современной политической ситуации вКавказском регионе / Московский центр Канерги,Российская экспертная группа 2010 (1) : 1 ~ 4
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Н.С.Белякова / 2015 / Роль и место Черкесского вороса в политике США,ЕС и Турции на Северном Кавказе / Вестник РУДН,серия Международные отношения (1) : 177 ~ 183
[인터넷자원] - / / https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=ujTCb6vhJjs
[단행본] - А.Ф.Авидзба / 2014 / Северо-Западный Кавказ:от прошлогок настоящему:Сборник материалов международной научной конференции / Фонд науки и образования : 35 ~
[단행본] - Материалы круглого стола / 2014 / Черкесский ворос:опыт,проблемы,перспективй научного осмысления / актуальные проблемы исторического дискурса
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Н.С.Белякова / 2015 / Роль и место Черкесского вороса в политике США,ЕС и Турции на Северном Кавказе / Вестник РУДН,серия Международные отношения (1) : 177 ~ 183
[인터넷자원] - / / https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=ujTCb6vhJjs
[단행본] - А.Ф.Авидзба / 2014 / Северо-Западный Кавказ:от прошлогок настоящему:Сборник материалов международной научной конференции / Фонд науки и образования : 35 ~
[단행본] - Материалы круглого стола / 2014 / Черкесский ворос:опыт,проблемы,перспективй научного осмысления / актуальные проблемы исторического дискурса
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
New opportunities for sustainable tourism : Central Asia and the Caucasus on the Silk Road
한국관광레저학회 학술발표대회
2019 .06
-
북카프카스 소수민족의 ‘피의 복수’: 용서와 화해의 변증적 방식을 중심으로
러시아연구
2017 .01
-
북카프카스 민족의 대 러시아 저항의 기원 : 18세기 이맘 만수르의 삶을 중심으로
한국이슬람학회 논총
2016 .01
-
코카서스 3국의 관광지 연구 -조지아, 아르메니아, 아제르바이잔을 중심으로-
경관과 지리
2019 .01
-
The Captive and the Gift: Cultural Histories of Sovereignty in Russia and the Caucasus. Bruce Grant. Cornell University Press. 2009. 216 pp. (ISBN-13: 9780801475412)
Acta Via Serica
2017 .06
-
Competition, stakes, and falling electoral participation in Central Asia and the Caucasus: A comparative analysis
Journal of Eurasian Studies
2020 .01
-
북카프카스 지역의 피의 복수와 아다트 관습법
중소연구
2018 .05
-
The New Geopolitics of the South Caucasus: Prospects for Regional Cooperation and Conflict Resolution. Shireen T. Hunter, ed. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 2017. 304 pp. (ISBN-13: 9781498564960)
Acta Via Serica
2018 .06
-
국가의 목적에 의해 희생된 고려인들의 강제이주 : 심헌용 (2017). 『러시아 민족정책과 강제이주』. 선인.
다문화사회연구
2020 .10
-
대만 외국인강제퇴거제도의 특징 및 정책적 함의
한국비교정부학보
2019 .01
-
Why Does Russia Behave as It Does? : Near Abroad: Putin, the West and the Contest over Ukraine and the Caucasus Edited by Gerard Toal (Gearóid Ó Tuathail)
Global Asia
2017 .03
-
Ali Bey Hüseyinzade and His Impact on National Thought in Turkey and the Caucasus
Acta Via Serica
2018 .12
-
Ethnic Cleansing as a Distinct Crime under International Law: Assessing the Case of Forcible Transfer of Ethnic Koreans in the Former USSR(1937)
국제법평론
2022 .10
-
외국인 추방 제도에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 출입국관리법을 중심으로 -
법조
2024 .04
-
From Conflict to Autonomy in the Caucasus: The Soviet Union and the Making of Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno Karabakh. By Arsène Saparov. New York: Routledge, 2017. 200 pp. ISBN: 978-0-415-65802-7. doi: 10.22679/avs.2022.7.1.011
Acta Via Serica
2022 .06
-
21세기 중국 민족정책 논쟁의 정치적 함의 분석
한국동북아논총
2023 .09
-
러시아-다게스탄 관계사를 통해서 본 다게스탄 민족 그룹의 정체성 연구
한국 시베리아연구
2016 .01
-
코카서스 북부 켈레르메스 유적 그리핀의 조형연구
러시아연구
2024 .05
-
A Study of the Cultural Policy of the Communist Party of China towards Ethnic Minorities in the New Century
문화정책
2015 .10
-
국제이주와 개발 : 글로벌 이주 거버넌스의 형성과 이민정책의 변화
국제정치연구
2015 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
북한의 베트남전쟁 참전에 대한 최초의 체계적 연구 : 이신재, 『북한의 베트남전쟁 참전』(서울: 국방부 군사편찬연구소, 2017)
이한우
군사
2017
.09
조선 · 일본군의 충남 내포지역 동학농민군 진압 연구
김양식
군사
2017
.06
시진핑 시기 중국특색 군사변혁의 함의 : 중국 국가 및 군사전략, 군 구조개편 방향의 상호연계성을 중심으로
심현섭
군사
2017
.06
제1차 세계대전과 러시아 여성의 군사적 참여 : 개별 여성군인과 제1 러시아 여성 결사대대의 사례
최지은
군사
2017
.03
1956년 헝가리 사태에 대한 남한의 인식과 대응
김도민
역사비평
2017
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-390-001031363