메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
저널정보
대한토목학회 대한토목학회 학술대회 제39회 대한토목학회 정기 학술대회
발행연도
2013.10
수록면
3,083 - 3,088 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is well known that the increase of foulants such as high-turbidity pollutants (i.e., colloidal particles) and different forms of natural organic matters (NOMs) in raw surface water, which all are often caused by heavy rainfall, result in heavy fouling on membrane surface and inhibit its operation. NOMs in raw surface water mostly comprise humic substances (i.e., humic acid and fulvic acid) and polysaccharides. The performance of coagulation and filtration process was evaluated to remove colloidal particles (Kaolin) and natural organic matters (NOMs) from high turbidity raw water. In this research, NOM was classified into hydrophobic strongly acidic NOM (HSN) and hydrophilic neutral NOM (HNN). As the result of jar test, turbidity of the supernatant was lowest at 7mL of alum injection concentration. In the individual test of HNN, HSN and Kaolin, removal efficiencies of turbidity were 93.9% for HSN, 76.3% for HNN and 99.4% for Kaolin, hence we found the HSN could much remove than HNN of NOMs by coagulation and filtration process, and most of Kaolin was removed by coagulation and filtration. In the mixture test of HNN and HSN, turbidity removal was 95.3%, and it was due that HSN helped the HSN coagulation. Finally, for the mixture test of HNN, HSN and Kaolin, removal efficiency was 99.4%, due to the coagulation capacity of Kaolin. Therefore, turbidity removal of HNN is better than HSN, because the zeta potential of HSN was lower than that of HNN, and also Kaolin had a role as a coagulant for HSN and HNN.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0