지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, I aim to compare the morphological and conceptual (semantic) differences between English and Korean flower name compounds. We can conclude three things. First, a lot of Korean compounds include kkot(-꽃) and hwa(-화) and they are in some way systematic. On the contrary, the English compounds have not shown any systematic order morphologically. Second, when we compare the 국화(chrysanthemum)-included compounds and the rose-included compounds, several lexical items are systematized as one category in one language, but not in the other language. Finally, conceptualization differences are shown in many cases such as morning glory vs. 나팔꽃(horn flower), Easter flower vs. 할미꽃(grandmother flower). When we form a compound noun, the salient part of the object is usually conceptualized by language users, but the focus, which has been lexicalized, is different between two languages. That is, conceptualization and lexicalization of the same object may differ in two language systems.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-740-000699325