개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Ancient Greece was a patriarchal society that distinguished gender roles between men and women. Although their costumes were composed of simple rectangular fabric without any technical complications in itself, the Greeks did try to express gender differences in their clothing. The final look of the Greek costume was dependent on the way the cloth draped onto its wearer as well as the wearer`s identity. Greeks costume could just be seen as a rectangular fabric when it was not draped on a person`s body. The purpose of this study is to examine how the gender differences were expressed in the ancient Greek drapery costume, which was made by using a completely different technical process, compared with the modern tailored costume. There are four elements of the costume that give the costume its formative shape, which are the wearer`s body, the rectangular fabric (material as the first formative costume), the way the fabric is draped, and the final appearance as the second formative costume (the relationship between the wearer`s body and the costume) and this study analyzes these elements individually. It is intended to analyze the gender characteristics and how each element appears in a different way from the perspective of Structuralism, an analytical method that considers a phenomenon as a total sum of the elements. Literature research was conducted and representative sculpture, painting and pottery, were used between the Archaic Period (B.C. 800∼500) and the Classical Period (B.C. 500∼323). The results show that the gender differences appear in each formative element of costume: First, the body was distinguished by the ancient Greek custom. The man`s nudity was accepted while the woman`s body was concealed. Second, in regards to the first formative costume, which was the rectangular fabric, men`s were made with thick high quality wool because their involvement in outdoor activities meant that they needed clothes to stay warm, while the women wore clothes made of thin wool or hemp cloth, because their most of their activities were at home. Third, the way to drape the fabric shows the gender differences by changing the length of the clothing and its design; men`s short khiton was practical for big movement and at the same time the clothing exposed the man`s body. The woman`s doric khiton diversified its decoration by the size of the apotigma and by using the belt. Finally the second formative costume reflected the Greeks` social distinction between a man`s body and a woman`s body. The man`s costume naturally exposed the man`s body. On the other hand, the woman`s long costume has a variety of shapes on the ground, that concealed her lower body, while the ornamental function was more accentuated than the man`s costume. The gender differences expressed in Greek costume fundamentally reflected the point of view of the male and female body and their social roles in society.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (46)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
고대그리스 플라톤의 사유와 남성 나체패션 : 여성주의 관점에서 복식철학에 관한 한 연구
연희원
현상학과 현대철학
2016
.06
자치권의 확대에 대한 이해와 오해: 역사적 고찰
김태영
OUGHTOPIA
2020
.10
앤 드뮐미스터의 여성복에 나타난 작품특성 연구 : 1990년대-2010년대 중심으로
방수란
한국디자인문화학회지
2017
.03
고대희랍의 가정과 여성 : 크세노폰의 Oeconomicus에 나타난 아내의 품성교육을 중심으로
오유석
도덕윤리과교육
2014
.07
아시아 전통 복식의 조형적 특성과 미적 가치 비교 연구 : 불교권, 힌두권, 이슬람권 복식을 중심으로
서봉하
복식
2014
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-381-000745325