지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study focuses on how General Lee achieved continuous victories in the beginning of Japanese invasion. Unlike previous studies that focused on the victory factors on the water, this study focuses on analyses of General Lee’s combat preparation and emphasized combat capability during initial stages of battles, which defeated Japanese forces.
The background of General Lee’s substantial war preparation came from the battle of Japanese invasion led by Hong-Yang in the Year of Jeong-Hae (1587). By developing the foundation for discipline and commanding system based on the past experience, Lee focused on creative, yet stuck to the basic war-preparation. One of Lee’s creative works was that he collected information of Japanese combat style to create his battle strategies: to deny enemy"s climbing up the warship, but to be close enough to target enemy ships with turtle ships, and to inspect the war preparations. For the war preparations, Lee inspected ships, various weapons, and defense system on the field. But most importantly, Lee’s victorious background originated from his nationally scaled propulsion for increasing the number of war-ships, development of cannons specially designed for battles against Japanese forces.
When the actual Lim-Gin Japanese invasion occurred, Lee was fully prepared to go to the war against Japan by utilizing the effective reporting system, which reached to Right naval HQ located in Jeon-Ra provinces, observatory posts, and central government in a very short time. Lee also prepared for all possible routes of Japanese incomings and settled his navy on sea of Gyeong-Sang waiting for the imminent battle command from the government.
In order to execute Command & Control system in the battle at the sea of Gyeong-Sang, Lee required strict command system, and hierarchy with Won-Gyun and Uk-Gi Lee’s fleet, which allowed well-coordinated strategic system. Also, strategy integrated intelligence, maneuver, fires, and force protections against Japanese Force. First, spot the enemy, approach with fleets during earl dawn when security is assured, then charge with turtle ships and full-on assailment of cannons with Pan-Ok ships to defeat Japanese Navy. After such strategy, Lee quickly ran away from the battle scene in order to prepare for the possible ambush attacks and buy some maintenance time for his navy. In summary, Lee achieved the victory via analyzing Japanese Navy’s current status, geography, water current, surround and attack strategy, ambush attacks, and effective maneuvers, which integrated with turtle ships and navy’s fire power. He also inspected his forces, fleets, and other weapons to sustain his combat capabilities. He distributed loots from the battles to his soldiers to alleviate their fear and fatigue.
The most important victory factor would be Lee’s victory oriented leadership. His leadership highlighted field focused operations, principles, executions, and keen discernment, which contributed to flexible strategies, all with courage, fairness, people and his navy.
In order to win the war, combat capability had to be performed at its best, and Lee’s victories at the initial battles exemplify preparation for the war and successful coordination of combat capability with his leadership in the naval battles.
The background of General Lee’s substantial war preparation came from the battle of Japanese invasion led by Hong-Yang in the Year of Jeong-Hae (1587). By developing the foundation for discipline and commanding system based on the past experience, Lee focused on creative, yet stuck to the basic war-preparation. One of Lee’s creative works was that he collected information of Japanese combat style to create his battle strategies: to deny enemy"s climbing up the warship, but to be close enough to target enemy ships with turtle ships, and to inspect the war preparations. For the war preparations, Lee inspected ships, various weapons, and defense system on the field. But most importantly, Lee’s victorious background originated from his nationally scaled propulsion for increasing the number of war-ships, development of cannons specially designed for battles against Japanese forces.
When the actual Lim-Gin Japanese invasion occurred, Lee was fully prepared to go to the war against Japan by utilizing the effective reporting system, which reached to Right naval HQ located in Jeon-Ra provinces, observatory posts, and central government in a very short time. Lee also prepared for all possible routes of Japanese incomings and settled his navy on sea of Gyeong-Sang waiting for the imminent battle command from the government.
In order to execute Command & Control system in the battle at the sea of Gyeong-Sang, Lee required strict command system, and hierarchy with Won-Gyun and Uk-Gi Lee’s fleet, which allowed well-coordinated strategic system. Also, strategy integrated intelligence, maneuver, fires, and force protections against Japanese Force. First, spot the enemy, approach with fleets during earl dawn when security is assured, then charge with turtle ships and full-on assailment of cannons with Pan-Ok ships to defeat Japanese Navy. After such strategy, Lee quickly ran away from the battle scene in order to prepare for the possible ambush attacks and buy some maintenance time for his navy. In summary, Lee achieved the victory via analyzing Japanese Navy’s current status, geography, water current, surround and attack strategy, ambush attacks, and effective maneuvers, which integrated with turtle ships and navy’s fire power. He also inspected his forces, fleets, and other weapons to sustain his combat capabilities. He distributed loots from the battles to his soldiers to alleviate their fear and fatigue.
The most important victory factor would be Lee’s victory oriented leadership. His leadership highlighted field focused operations, principles, executions, and keen discernment, which contributed to flexible strategies, all with courage, fairness, people and his navy.
In order to win the war, combat capability had to be performed at its best, and Lee’s victories at the initial battles exemplify preparation for the war and successful coordination of combat capability with his leadership in the naval battles.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 이순신의 전투준비태세 분석
3. 이순신의 초기전투 승리요인
4. 맺음말
〈ABSTRAC〉
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 나종우 / 1981 / 이순신장군의 전략전술 / 전북사학 5 : 79 ~ 97
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태준 / 2007 / 이순신 장군의 해전승리 요인 분석 / 교수논충 44 : 83 ~ 95
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김강녕 / 2012 / 이순신의 해전:주요 승전사례와 전쟁사적 의의 / 군사논단 (69) : 170 ~
[단행본] - 이민웅 / 2012 / 이순신 평전 / 성안당 : 72 ~
[학술대회논문] - 이민웅 / 2014 / 임진왜란 시기 호남 수군의 활약과 전략전술 / 학술대회 발표논문집 : 61 ~
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태준 / 2007 / 이순신 장군의 해전승리 요인 분석 / 교수논충 44 : 83 ~ 95
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김강녕 / 2012 / 이순신의 해전:주요 승전사례와 전쟁사적 의의 / 군사논단 (69) : 170 ~
[단행본] - 이민웅 / 2012 / 이순신 평전 / 성안당 : 72 ~
[학술대회논문] - 이민웅 / 2014 / 임진왜란 시기 호남 수군의 활약과 전략전술 / 학술대회 발표논문집 : 61 ~
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
임진왜란 시 청주성 전투에 관한 실증적 고찰
한국군사학논총
2020 .01
-
러일전쟁 최후의 해상전투, ‘동해해전’ 재구성
군사
2015 .12
-
사상 최대 레이테 해전의 전투경과 분석과 전투 교훈 고찰
한국군사학논총
2017 .06
-
전투사례를 통해 본 정신전력의 중요성과 강화방안 : 임진왜란 해전 사례를 중심으로
정신전력연구
2018 .11
-
명량해전 이후 조선함대의 해상진 이동 이유에 대한 전략적 분석 - 콜벳의 현존함대 전략을 중심으로
한국군사학논총
2021 .01
-
백마고지 전투의 재조명 : 국군 제9사단의 향상된 전투수행 능력 분석을 중심으로
군사
2017 .12
-
이정암과 연안성 전투의 군사적 의의
한국군사학논총
2019 .01
-
6·25전쟁기 영천전투의 재조명
한국군사학논집
2021 .02
-
전쟁에서 발생하는 전투의 규모와 빈도 관계에 적용되는 멱함수 분포에 대한 연구
Crisisonomy
2021 .08
-
일본 조선군기물(朝鮮軍記物)에 그려진 칠천량 해전(漆川梁海戰) －근세 초기 작품을 중심으로－
일본언어문화
2016 .01
-
사할린전투에 관한 일고(一考)
군사
2015 .12
-
후삼국 통일전쟁과 운주전투
군사
2019 .03
-
공민왕 13(1364)년 김속명(金續命)의 진해현(鎭海縣) 전투와 육전론(陸戰論)
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .10
-
변혁적 리더십이 육군의 전투력 증진에 미치는 영향 연구: 전투부대 규모 및 부대 유형의 조절효과를 중심으로
한국행정논집
2022 .12
-
북접농민군의 전투방식과 영동 용산전투
동학학보
2018 .09
-
아리마 세이호(有馬成甫)의 『조선역 수군사(朝鮮役水軍史)』(1942)에 보이는 이순신 비판론
군사
2020 .03
-
VICTORY SHOW 2024
월간 플래툰
2024 .02
-
VICTORY SHOW 2025-1
월간 플래툰
2025 .02
-
‘세계 4대 해전’의 근거에 대한 고찰 : 국내의 ‘세계 4대 해전’ 담론 형성과정을 중심으로
군사
2016 .12
-
차세대 함정 전투체계 아키텍처 구축방안에 관한 연구
한국군사과학기술학회지
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-002836497