개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.5
- 수록면
- 92 - 97 (6page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Most previous studies on ramp slopes have considered only ascending ramps even though descending ramps are also important in wheelchair driving on ramps. Effects of ramp slope on wheelchair users could be different between ascent and descent, especially for subjective ratings. This study therefore compared ascending and descending ramps with a focus on physical discomfort and psychological anxiety to determine whether or not descending ramp should be considered in suggesting appropriate ramp slope. Thirty participants ascended and descended five ramps with different slopes (1:6, 1:8, 1:10, 1:12, and 1:14), and reported on physical discomfort and psychological anxiety for both the ascent and descent. The effects of ramp slope were generally similar between the ascent and descent with respect to both physical discomfort and psychological anxiety. Physical discomfort in ascent was higher than that in descent for all ramp slopes, however, psychological anxiety in ascent was not. There was a high correlation between ascent and descent in terms of both physical discomfort and psychological anxiety. Based on these results, we concluded that physical discomfort in descent may not need to be considered when determining appropriate ramp slopes. The results from ascent could not include the results from descent for psychological anxiety. It may be acceptable to consider psychological anxiety only in ascent due to the high correlation between ascent and descent.
목차
ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Results
4. Discussion and conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-530-002491552