지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to investigate and compare the Emigration Museums in Korea and Germany: The Museum of Korea Emigration History(MKEH), The German Emigration Center in Bremerhaven and BallinStadt, and The Emigration Museum Hamburg.
First, we introduce the history and characteristics of each museum. The results of our observations and interviews with visitors and the representatives of the museums would be reflected to find out, how the museums their identity build and what are their similarities and differences. It lies at the center of our observation and the comparison, whether the themes of the exhibition are appropriately transferred through the communication with the visitors.
MKEH opened on June 13, 2008 and is located on Wolmi Island to close the Incheon’s harbour from where the first generation of Korean Americans departed 100 years ago. The German Emigration Center in Bremerhaven, situated in the New Harbor, opened on August 8, 2005 and was visited annually by more than 200 thousand people. It opened its new extension wing on April 22, 2012, which focuses on the history of Germany as a country of immigration. BallinStadt The Emigration Museum Hamburg, located on the ground of the former ‘Emigrants’ Halls’ on Veddel Island, opened on July 4, 2007. These 3 Museums have in common that they are located on historic ground that was the departure point for the emigrants to the new world. In addition, they all try combining the educational and entertaining aspects in the exhibition.
Based on our observations and research, we’ll make some suggestions for MKEH. First, related to the preparation process of the exhibition, a good exhibition requires the solid research of the historical facts. Second, it is needed to check, on which aspect of the basic concepts - Education or Entertainment? - MKEH puts a greater weight and what are the advantages and disadvantages of this concept. Third, the interaction of visitors and museum must be reflected in a more aggressive scheme. Fourth, MKEH has focused until now mainly on the emigration to America, especially to Hawaii. It is recommendable to focus on the history of emigration to other continents and the history of immigration to Korea as well. Finally, the Museum should exist in the close connection with the neighboring regions. It should prepare it’s exhibition in the thematic conjunction with the other museums and provide the visitors with more varied and interesting context for their own reflection and recognition.
First, we introduce the history and characteristics of each museum. The results of our observations and interviews with visitors and the representatives of the museums would be reflected to find out, how the museums their identity build and what are their similarities and differences. It lies at the center of our observation and the comparison, whether the themes of the exhibition are appropriately transferred through the communication with the visitors.
MKEH opened on June 13, 2008 and is located on Wolmi Island to close the Incheon’s harbour from where the first generation of Korean Americans departed 100 years ago. The German Emigration Center in Bremerhaven, situated in the New Harbor, opened on August 8, 2005 and was visited annually by more than 200 thousand people. It opened its new extension wing on April 22, 2012, which focuses on the history of Germany as a country of immigration. BallinStadt The Emigration Museum Hamburg, located on the ground of the former ‘Emigrants’ Halls’ on Veddel Island, opened on July 4, 2007. These 3 Museums have in common that they are located on historic ground that was the departure point for the emigrants to the new world. In addition, they all try combining the educational and entertaining aspects in the exhibition.
Based on our observations and research, we’ll make some suggestions for MKEH. First, related to the preparation process of the exhibition, a good exhibition requires the solid research of the historical facts. Second, it is needed to check, on which aspect of the basic concepts - Education or Entertainment? - MKEH puts a greater weight and what are the advantages and disadvantages of this concept. Third, the interaction of visitors and museum must be reflected in a more aggressive scheme. Fourth, MKEH has focused until now mainly on the emigration to America, especially to Hawaii. It is recommendable to focus on the history of emigration to other continents and the history of immigration to Korea as well. Finally, the Museum should exist in the close connection with the neighboring regions. It should prepare it’s exhibition in the thematic conjunction with the other museums and provide the visitors with more varied and interesting context for their own reflection and recognition.
목차
I. 글을 시작하며
II. 브레머하펜의 독일이민사박물관
III. 발린슈타트 함부르크 이민사박물관
IV. 인천의 한국이민사박물관
V. 한국이민사박물관의 미래를 위한 제언
VI. 결론을 대신하여
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-001-002360616