메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신두호 (강원대학교)
저널정보
인천대학교 인문학연구소 인문학연구 인문학연구 제17집
발행연도
2012.6
수록면
23 - 53 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As academic disciplines, the humanities traditionally address themes that are detached from the society and social activities such as the human condition, ethicality, values and beliefs and employ text-oriented methods that are primarily analytical, critical, or speculative, distancing themselves not only from the empirical analysis of the social sciences on human society or social activities of social sciences but also from the empirical approaches of the natural sciences on natural phenomena. This has been especially true to literary studies. The deep attachment to the detached attitude and text analysis by literary studies has confined literary critics to the ivory tower, neglecting the social issues and responsibility and thus inviting isolation and criticism from outside. When it comes to an academic approach to ecology which has currently become one of the most important and impending themes and concerns to almost every academic discipline including literary studies, the traditional attitude and method of the humanities turns out to be incongruent. The eco prefix has three related references of the physical, the socio-political, and the scientific. In all literary genres, nature writing best deals with and addresses these references, and accordingly it has become a primary genre of interest to the studies of ecology-oriented literature, or ecocriticism. Unfortunately, ecocriticism still sticks to the humanities" traditional attitude and method. A careful examination of The Land of Little Rain by an American nature writer Mary Austin proves that this work on American western desert land addresses three aspects of the physical, the socio-political, and the scientific, and that therefore demands critics to approach from all these perspectives that still further invites direct and active participation and exploration of the real place.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 생태학의 다층적 의미와 문학생태학적 접근
Ⅲ. 미국서부 사막지대와 메리 오스틴
Ⅳ. 탈인문학적 문학생태학을 위하여
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0