메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제15집 제2호
발행연도
2013.6
수록면
197 - 240 (44page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Due to the recent financial crisis originated from the United States in the second half of 2007, particularly, the southwestern European countries (hereinafter PIIGS) are facing extreme difficulty. Even though the situations of Ireland, Greece and Spain among the PIIGS which are grappling with such financial crisis is severe, the case of Italy is far more severe than them because the amount of the Italian budget deficit is bigger than the sum of the amounts of the three countries` national budget deficit. Furthermore, according to a new report, the weak financial regulation made such Italian situation worse. Also, Korea is very similar to Italy as released by a report. In this sense, the piece examines the Italian regulation over banking business and tries to find out some lessons from it as follows: First, there are several financial regulators in Italy while there is a single financial regulator in Korea. Second, the issue of electronic money is not fundraising in Italy. However, such issue is also fundraising like a deposit. Moreover, three different authorizations depending on financial institutions are required to deal electronic money in Korea while only one authorization without financial institutions is needed to treat such money in Italy. Third, the minimum capital requirement for banking business in Korea is ten times as compared with that of Italy. Fourth, there are diverse and detailed provisions for bank`s investment limits and holdings in a bank in Korea. However, there are not in Italy. Fifth, the Korean legal system has not only the internal control system but also the compliance officers while the Italian legal system has only the internal control system, not the compliance officers. Sixth, there is a prompt corrective action in Korea while there is not in Italy. Seventh, the Korean and Italian legal system have the provision for the corporate opportunity doctrine. However, Korea focuses on the directors who belong to a financial institution while Italy includes directors, large stockholders and workers. Eighth, Italian legal system has some detailed provisions for the internal and international cooperation of financial regulators. However, Korea has few provisions for the cooperation among financial regulators. Finally, Italy has the temporary suspension for the administrative and control bodies` power in a bank without suspending its banking business while Korea has not.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002567762