지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Law attempts to dominate our whole lives. Some legal philosophers think law has omnipotent power over human behaviors and affairs. The optimistic view contradicts the common knowledge that law can`t meet every need of men and societies. Does law have enough power to regulate all of the members in a society? It leaves room for doubts. Law reaches the limits in the realms of Is(Sein) and Ought-to(Sollen). There is no doubt that law should not violate the individual freedom and rights nowadays. Notwithstanding, law often infringes on individual rights. How far can exercise legally the state power over individual freedom and rights. It is classic question of political philosophy and social philosophy. The normative limits of law i.e. the limits of law in the viewpoint of legitimacy of law relates to the nature of law. If law is considered as a mechanism of protecting individual freedom and rights, the limits of law enter another phase. How far can law protect the individual freedom and rights? It does not focus on the legitimacy, but the effectiveness of law. In this context, the practical limits of law relates to the functions of law. Furthermore, law consists of legal norms. In principle, it only regulates the members of the legal community. The constitutive limit of law relates to the legality of law. In sum, the questions about the limits of law relate to the all kind of validity including effectiveness, legality, and legitimacy of law. So, the discourse on the nature of law`s limits requires the reflections on the nature, functions and validity of law. It is necessary to elucidate an indeterminacy of the meaning of law`s limits in order to discuss types and remedies of law`s limits. The limits of law have three different meaning: practical, normative, and constitutive limit. These meanings cross over each other in some real cases. While it causes a conceptual confusion, it also reflects the interrelationship among the meanings of law`s limits.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (38)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김학태 / 2000 / 법의 상징기능에 관한 연구: 상징입법의 개념과 기능에 대한 비판적 고찰 / 법철학연구 3 (2) : 171 ~ 194
2. [단행본] - 심헌섭 / 1985 / 법철학 / 한국방송통신대학 출판부
3. [단행본] - 심헌섭 / 2001 / 분석과 비판의 법철학 / 법문사
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 홍영기 / 2005 / 국가권력의 한계, 어디에서 비롯되는가 / 법철학연구 8 (1) : 199 ~ 232
5. [단행본] - Allot, A / 1980 / The Limits of Law / Butterworths
2. [단행본] - 심헌섭 / 1985 / 법철학 / 한국방송통신대학 출판부
3. [단행본] - 심헌섭 / 2001 / 분석과 비판의 법철학 / 법문사
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 홍영기 / 2005 / 국가권력의 한계, 어디에서 비롯되는가 / 법철학연구 8 (1) : 199 ~ 232
5. [단행본] - Allot, A / 1980 / The Limits of Law / Butterworths
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002568441