메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제12집 제4호
발행연도
2010.12
수록면
351 - 386 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The issue of suicide is located in the center of public discourse of today. The legal sentiment of the people seems to catch up the teachings of wise men that some suicide are essentially free and rational act, furthermore noble, heroic and obligatory act. Meanwhile, the traditional moral sense of suicide has been changed by the emphasis on the patients` right of self-determination according to the shift of biomedical paradigm. Notwithstanding, the new trend does not succeed in breaking the taboo of suicide. Suicide has been considered not a expression of basic human rights or liberty, but as a evil to be avoided and prevented. The right of self-determination on suicide is restricted because of prudent policy of suicide, risk of trend to take human life lightly. Only the skeleton of the right of self-determination based on human dignity remains in the end of life. Suicide is a legal issue that should be discussed in relation with the decision of patients in the end of life, for example, the withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment or physician-assisted death. Man has liberty to make one`s life planning. Human beings has an authority on decision in death unlike in birth. Some suicide are moral, rational, and justifiable suicide. But I hope someone will not believe that it would be rational to suicide in a certain situation. Notwithstanding, once someone judge prudently, choice voluntarily, and try successfully a suicide act, the suicide will be a prima facie rational suicide.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002574325