지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.12
- 수록면
- 4 - 18 (15page)
- DOI
- 10.7849/ksnre.2015.12.11.4.4
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Korea, the bulk of investment in research and development within the renewable energy sector is channeled towards technologies which are close to commercialization. In addition, the majority of financial support from government agencies reflects an investment in firms, rather than universities or small firms. However, the performance, in terms of market share and price competitiveness, of Korean renewable energy technology is still very low in the overseas market. There remains a greater amount of R&D investment is received by large firms rather than smaller firms. However, it has not been shown that the R&D efficiency of larger firms is greater than that of smaller firms.
The paper estimates that a productivity of 1340 R&D projects from 2008 to 2012 in renewable energy technology by performers and by technical progress phase using output-oriented BCC modelling in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The results reveal that the efficiency of basic R&D research is higher in universities and institutes, while the efficiency achieved in applied research is higher within larger firms. However, the efficiencies achieved in development research is low in general, regardless of whether the R&D is carried out in a large firm, smaller form or university.
The paper estimates that a productivity of 1340 R&D projects from 2008 to 2012 in renewable energy technology by performers and by technical progress phase using output-oriented BCC modelling in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The results reveal that the efficiency of basic R&D research is higher in universities and institutes, while the efficiency achieved in applied research is higher within larger firms. However, the efficiencies achieved in development research is low in general, regardless of whether the R&D is carried out in a large firm, smaller form or university.
목차
ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Empirical studies on the Schumpeterian hypotheses
3. Methodology
4. Analytical framework
5. Empirical research
6. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (35)
참고문헌 신청
[인터넷자원] - KETEP / / New and renewable energy
[인터넷자원] - OECD / / IEA Energy Technology RD&D Statistics
[인터넷자원] - NTIS / / National R&D programs management
[인터넷자원] - Chae, D. / / Reduced again government budget on new and renewable energy / Energy & Environment News
[단행본] - Galbraith, J. / 1952 / American Capitalism: The concept of countervailing power / Houghton Mifflin
[인터넷자원] - OECD / / IEA Energy Technology RD&D Statistics
[인터넷자원] - NTIS / / National R&D programs management
[인터넷자원] - Chae, D. / / Reduced again government budget on new and renewable energy / Energy & Environment News
[단행본] - Galbraith, J. / 1952 / American Capitalism: The concept of countervailing power / Houghton Mifflin
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국가연구개발사업의 질적 효율성 분석에 관한 사례연구: 농림축산 분야를 중심으로
디지털산업정보학회논문지
2018 .01
-
국가연구개발사업 질적 효율성의 동태적 분석
디지털산업정보학회논문지
2019 .01
-
국내 의료기기 제조기업의 기업특성과 R&D 및 생산성 간의 관계 : 집단 간 비교 분석
대한산업공학회지
2018 .12
-
Performance Evaluation of National R&D Investment in Information Technology Areas
한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
2017 .02
-
국가 R&D 기술적 성과의 협력 유형별 질적 효율성 분석
한국경영공학회지
2020 .01
-
첨단산업기술(6T) 연구개발사업의 효율성 분석:2단계 네트워크 DEA 접근의 적용
산업경영시스템학회지
2021 .09
-
Analysis of R&D Efficiency Change in IT Sector using Cumulative Malmquist Index
International JOURNAL OF CONTENTS
2022 .12
-
씨앤에치아이앤씨(주)
대한토목학회지
2021 .12
-
Q&A
콘크리트학회지
2021 .11
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2021 .09
-
Q&A
콘크리트학회지
2023 .11
-
Q&A
콘크리트학회지
2022 .11
-
Q&A
콘크리트학회지
2022 .05
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2021 .01
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2021 .03
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2022 .07
-
Q&A
콘크리트학회지
2022 .03
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2020 .11
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2022 .09
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2021 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-530-002233747