메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
An, Ji Sun (Kyungil University)
저널정보
한국전시산업융합연구원 한국과학예술융합학회 한국과학예술포럼 Vol.22
발행연도
2015.12
수록면
207 - 220 (14page)
DOI
10.17548/ksaf.2015.12.22.207

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Critiquing is an essential teaching and learning tool in design education. Different types of critiques create various outcomes. Many design educators have examined a wide range of critique types for their learning advantages. In particular, peer critique is more effective for removing students’ emotional pressure than more formal critiques. However, peer critique is still considered to create emotional burdens or unfair evaluations among peers. To overcome this drawback of peer critiques, educators in language disciplines often use anonymous feedback. Yet, anonymous critique"s learning outcomes have not been extensively discussed in design education. Therefore, this study aims to qualitatively investigate how graphic design students perceive the learning benefits and drawbacks of anonymous critiques with peers as critique providers and receivers.
We implemented two anonymous critiques using rubrics in a senior graphic design class for the spring semester of 2015 at K university. After each critique session, students completed self-assessment reports based on the critique comments they received. For outcome measurement, we conducted three focus group interviews with thirteen students. The questionnaires focus on how these students as critique providers and receivers perceive the learning benefits and drawbacks of anonymous and face-to-face critiques.
Our findings align with the previous literature reviews; students, as a critique provider, perceive anonymous critiques as useful for removing an emotional burden and conveying their objective ideas. However, they criticized this type of critique as it consumes excessive amounts of time and also produces another type of emotional burden due to the obligation of writing it. On the other hand, as a critique receiver, they shared positive experiences of being able to keep the critique records and repeat learning as well as receive constructive and comprehensive opinions. The learning drawbacks of receiving this type of critique include receiving insincere critiques or not being able to interact with critiquers. Lastly, we provided teaching guidelines for an effective anonymous design critique.
By understanding these anonymous critique outcomes, design educators would be able to have a more systematic approach when conducting anonymous critique sessions.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Literature Review
Ⅲ Conducting an Analysis of Anonymous Critiques in Design Class
Ⅳ. Methods
Ⅴ. Findings
Ⅵ. Conclusion & Limitations
Reference

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-600-002232094