메뉴 건너뛰기
내서재 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

Operative Treatment of Medial Epicondylitis : A Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes between the Suture Anchor Group and the Non-suture Anchor Group
추천
검색
질문

Operative Treatment of Medial Epicondylitis : A Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes between the Suture Anchor Group and the Non-suture Anchor Group

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Sang Jin Cheon (Pusan National University Hospital) Woong Ki Jeon (Pusan National University Hospital)
저널정보
대한견주관절의학회 대한견주관절의학회지 대한견주관절학회지 제18권 제4호 KCI Accredited Journals
발행연도
2015.12
수록면
221 - 228 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
Operative Treatment of Medial Epicondylitis : A Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes between the Suture Anchor Group and the Non-suture Anchor Group
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: The The purpose of this study was to make a comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes after the operative treatment of refractory medial epicondylitis between the suture anchor group and the non-suture anchor group.
Methods: We enrolled 20 patients (7 men and 13 women) with recalcitrant medial epicondylitis who were able to receive operative treatment in a minimum of an 18-month follow-up. The mean age was 48.6 years (range, 36–59 years). The patients were allocated into either the suture anchor group (7 patients) or the non-suture anchor group (13 patients). We evaluated clinical outcomes using the visual analog scale (VAS), the pain grading system of Nirschl and Pettrone, and postoperative grip strength.
Results: The VAS score decreased from 8.8 to 2.0 for the suture anchor group and from 8.6 to 1.3 for the non-suture anchor group(p=0.16). The postoperative grip strength was 95%, 93% of the non-treated arm in both groups (p=0.32). The postoperative satisfaction level was good in 5 patients and fair in 2 for the suture anchor group and excellent in 5 patients, good, in 4, and fair, in 4 for the nonsuture anchor group (p=0.43). The clinical outcomes did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups.
Conclusions: We found that patients with recalcitrant medial epicondylitis were treated reliably with satisfactory clinical outcomes whether or not suture anchors were used. We believe the use of suture anchors when more than 50% of the tendon origin is affected provides an effective and favorable treatment modality.

목차

Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)

0

첫번째 댓글을 남겨주세요.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-514-002319597