메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김가나 (고려대학교) 김소연 (고려대학교) 김차용 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국사회체육학회 한국사회체육학회지 한국사회체육학회지 제62호
발행연도
2015.11
수록면
297 - 310 (14page)
DOI
10.51979/KSSLS.2015.11.62.297

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The very purpose of this research is to find out if the desired benefits which KLPGA gallery holds and selection properties influence people’ choices on their re-visits. The participants for this research were 20-year-old male and female who had participated ‘ADT CAPS Championship 2014’ and ‘Chosun-posco Championship 2014’. 200 surveys per championship which amounted to 400 surveys were given out. The survey was conducted in Non-Probability Sampling method within which judgement sampling method was used. 106 surveys which were deemed as inaccurate and insincere were isolated and the remaining 294 surveys were selected as effective measurement. As for the data processing, IBM SPSS 21.0 Version program was used to perform frequency analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. The result of analysis is as follows. First, the difference in benefit sought and selection attribute depending on demographic characteristics, it showed difference in accessibility factor in gender and showed significant difference at leisure activities, health promotion, and facility level in age. Second, amongst desired benefits from KLPGA competition gallery, it turned out that activities carried out during leisure, famous sports players and competition factors influenced on people choice of revisiting. On the other hand, social activities, promotion of health and skill learning factors did not contribute on choices of revisiting. Third, although the service and accessibility within KLPGA competition were seen to have provided positive influence on revisit, facility standard, cost factors were seen to be irrelevant from the purpose of this research.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (71)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0