개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyzes the Japanese relative clause studies which were published by Chinese National Core Journals and then summarizes the status quo and trend in terms of research method and linguistic theory.
First, the researches in China focus on the verbs in the clause, most of which are from masters’ and PHDs’ dissertations. Second, the language contrast study is still used by most language researchers. Inoue(2006) put forward three types theory-analyzing and inducing, itemizing and relating, in which the first two types are often used to research on Japanese relative clause in China. The researchers seldom choose the type of relating in the study, which is the better way to show the language characteristics that cannot be found in the monolingual study. Third, Yang Kairong(2011) thoroughly summarizes and interprets the reasons that cause the syntactical differences of Japanese and Chinese relative clauses. Fourth, Corpus Analyzing Tool developed by Shi Jianjun(2010) is contributing to the collecting of Japanese relative clauses from samples. Fifth, various languages theories are employed to analyze syntactical functions. Besides the traditional theories put forward by the Chinese and Japanese linguistics, the cognitive linguistics is applied by more and more researchers.
First, the researches in China focus on the verbs in the clause, most of which are from masters’ and PHDs’ dissertations. Second, the language contrast study is still used by most language researchers. Inoue(2006) put forward three types theory-analyzing and inducing, itemizing and relating, in which the first two types are often used to research on Japanese relative clause in China. The researchers seldom choose the type of relating in the study, which is the better way to show the language characteristics that cannot be found in the monolingual study. Third, Yang Kairong(2011) thoroughly summarizes and interprets the reasons that cause the syntactical differences of Japanese and Chinese relative clauses. Fourth, Corpus Analyzing Tool developed by Shi Jianjun(2010) is contributing to the collecting of Japanese relative clauses from samples. Fifth, various languages theories are employed to analyze syntactical functions. Besides the traditional theories put forward by the Chinese and Japanese linguistics, the cognitive linguistics is applied by more and more researchers.
목차
1. 本研究の目的
2. 調査範囲
3. 連体修飾節の定義
4. 研究方法と言語理論の応用
5. 終わりに
参考文献
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-830-001999276