메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
南美英 (慶星大学)
저널정보
중앙대학교 일본연구소 일본연구 일본연구 제36집
발행연도
2014.2
수록면
7 - 21 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It will be able to say that the next demonstration so far, are summarized.
Although, in Japanese sentence structure, adjectives and nouns can be used predicatively, they lack motional [active] expressions. So, mainly, their primary function is to indicate stativity.
In the case of the predicate verb, [active] means a major feature, but the significant semantic function of the status property can not be overlooked.
The predicate verb that includes stativity has state condition from the beginning or sometimes it has the condition, depending on the sentence structure.
This paper specifies sentences that attains the stative meaning by [Properties] as well as by syntactic structure.
[Changes steady state], but not invariant to perform the change, condition persists for type [adjective persistent state changes] will be. And finally, after a temporary change lasting Temporary changes in steady state can be mentioned.
State of verb et al would then take on a strong “state property” and is located in the attributive predicate is closely related to the main noun, it should be considered as one group.
Compared to the predicate is a predicate overdue order Status Name stands out was discussion about the limitations of predicate types. As a result, when indicates stativity, the “ru” shows its limit to some extent limit.

목차

1. はじめに
2. 従来の状態性をめぐって
3. 考察の展開方向
4. 連体動詞における状態性の意味類型
5. 連体動詞の状態性における述語形式の制限
6. まとめ
参考文献
Abstract

참고문헌 (7)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-830-001999903