지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.12
- 수록면
- 41 - 48 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives: Korean regression models for spirometric reference values are different from those of other ethnic groups. The purpose of this study was to evaluate discordance in spirometric interpretations based on using Korean reference equations versus non-Korean reference equations.
Methods: Spirometry was performed on 825 Korean male workers from April 2009 to November 2011. The spirometric patterns and disease severity were evaluated using two Korean equations (Choi’s and Lee’s) and three equations for Caucasians (NHANES III, Morris’s, and Knudson’s), and the results of Choi’s equation were compared with the non-Korean equations. The spirometric patterns were defined as normal, restrictive, and mild and moderate obstructive.
Results: The mean differences in the FEV1% and FVC% between the two Korean equations were 2.0 ± 1.3% and 3.5 ± 2.2%, respectively. Morris’s equation had the greatest difference in the FEV1% from Choi’s equation: 32.9 ± 8.5%. Knudson’s equation had the greatest difference in the FVC% from Choi’s equation: 10.5 ± 6.5%.
Conclusions: The two Korean equations shared similar characteristics of spirometric interpretation. The spirometric interpretations of Choi’s equation were significantly different from those of Morris’s equation and Knudson’s equation.
Methods: Spirometry was performed on 825 Korean male workers from April 2009 to November 2011. The spirometric patterns and disease severity were evaluated using two Korean equations (Choi’s and Lee’s) and three equations for Caucasians (NHANES III, Morris’s, and Knudson’s), and the results of Choi’s equation were compared with the non-Korean equations. The spirometric patterns were defined as normal, restrictive, and mild and moderate obstructive.
Results: The mean differences in the FEV1% and FVC% between the two Korean equations were 2.0 ± 1.3% and 3.5 ± 2.2%, respectively. Morris’s equation had the greatest difference in the FEV1% from Choi’s equation: 32.9 ± 8.5%. Knudson’s equation had the greatest difference in the FVC% from Choi’s equation: 10.5 ± 6.5%.
Conclusions: The two Korean equations shared similar characteristics of spirometric interpretation. The spirometric interpretations of Choi’s equation were significantly different from those of Morris’s equation and Knudson’s equation.
목차
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
1. [인터넷자원] - The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health / / Spirometry
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - American Thoracic Society / 1991 / Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies / Am Rev Respir Dis 144 (5) : 1202 ~ 1218
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박주헌 / 2011 / 새로운 호흡기 장애 판정 기준의 제안 / Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 70 (3) : 199 ~ 205
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 최정근 / 2005 / 한국인의 정상 폐활량 예측치 / Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 58 (3) : 230 ~ 242
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Townsend MC / 2011 / Occupational and environmental lung disorders committee.spirometry in the occupational health setting-2011 update / J Occup Environ Med 53 (5) : 569 ~ 584
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - American Thoracic Society / 1991 / Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies / Am Rev Respir Dis 144 (5) : 1202 ~ 1218
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박주헌 / 2011 / 새로운 호흡기 장애 판정 기준의 제안 / Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 70 (3) : 199 ~ 205
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 최정근 / 2005 / 한국인의 정상 폐활량 예측치 / Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 58 (3) : 230 ~ 242
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Townsend MC / 2011 / Occupational and environmental lung disorders committee.spirometry in the occupational health setting-2011 update / J Occup Environ Med 53 (5) : 569 ~ 584
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-517-001953341