지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Battle of Lepanto which took place in the Gulf of Patras near Lepanto in the morning of the 7th October 1571 between the Christian Saint League and the Ottoman empire was a historical event. The battle in which more than 400 galleys and 100,000 men fought for 4 hours was finished by the over whelming victory of the Saint League. This was a great victory for the Christian world after the long series of defeats in the land as well as in the sea. It can be freed from the long terror and inferiority vis-a-vis the Ottoman empire.
Who is responsible for the victory of the Saint League? It is undeniable that Don John, the commander in chief, contributed to forming a unified force, the Saint League, which was inherently divided and hostile against each other. And, among others, the superiority of the ordnance of the new Galleasses and the Galleys and the individual weapons such as muskets compared with those of the Ottoman Empire which had the pikes and swords. In short, the victory was a victory of the leadership and the modernized arms of the western world.
Most historians agree with Fernand Braudel who considers the Battle of Lepanto to be a historical ‘event’ which doesn"t exert any influence on the historical ‘structure’. There are some historians who argue that the Ottoman empire won the final victory by retaking Tunis and La Golette in 1574. But, it cannot be justified to underestimate the historical role of the victory of the Battle of Lepanto. It enabled the Christian world to be freed from the long inferiority, which led eventually to the balance of power in the Mediterranean world. The Ottoman empire was recovered rapidly from the loss of the galleys, but the recovery of the skillful manpower needed long time. The balance of power led to the peace. Then, each empire could concentrateitsforcesontheinternalproblems. Spain turned to the north, while the Ottoman empire turned to the east, leaving the Mediterranean sea vacant. The Atlantic Ocean supplanted the Mediterranean sea as the center of the European civilization.
The victory of the Battle of Lepanto did a great part in this historical transition. In this sense, it can be rightly regarded as an event which influenced the historical “structure"
Who is responsible for the victory of the Saint League? It is undeniable that Don John, the commander in chief, contributed to forming a unified force, the Saint League, which was inherently divided and hostile against each other. And, among others, the superiority of the ordnance of the new Galleasses and the Galleys and the individual weapons such as muskets compared with those of the Ottoman Empire which had the pikes and swords. In short, the victory was a victory of the leadership and the modernized arms of the western world.
Most historians agree with Fernand Braudel who considers the Battle of Lepanto to be a historical ‘event’ which doesn"t exert any influence on the historical ‘structure’. There are some historians who argue that the Ottoman empire won the final victory by retaking Tunis and La Golette in 1574. But, it cannot be justified to underestimate the historical role of the victory of the Battle of Lepanto. It enabled the Christian world to be freed from the long inferiority, which led eventually to the balance of power in the Mediterranean world. The Ottoman empire was recovered rapidly from the loss of the galleys, but the recovery of the skillful manpower needed long time. The balance of power led to the peace. Then, each empire could concentrateitsforcesontheinternalproblems. Spain turned to the north, while the Ottoman empire turned to the east, leaving the Mediterranean sea vacant. The Atlantic Ocean supplanted the Mediterranean sea as the center of the European civilization.
The victory of the Battle of Lepanto did a great part in this historical transition. In this sense, it can be rightly regarded as an event which influenced the historical “structure"
목차
1. 머리말
2. 오스만투르크제국의 위협과 신성동맹
3. 최후의 갤리선 대첩
4. 결과 없는 승리?
5. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
Niccolò Capponi / 2007 / Victory of the West, In The Great Christian-Muslim Clash at the Battle of Lepanto / Da Capo Press
Fernand Braudel / 1985 / La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l'époque de Philippe II, tome 2 / Armand Colin :383
Fernand Braudel / 1996 / Lépante: Bilan d'une bataille, In Autour de La Méditerranée / Editions de Fallois :291
볼프강 슈말레 / 2006 / 유럽의 재발견 - 신화와 정체성으로 보는 유럽의 역사 / 을유문화사 :15
V. J. Parry / 1980 / The Ottoman Empire, 1520~1566, In The New Cambridge Modern History, 제2권 / Cambridge University Press :510~516
Fernand Braudel / 1985 / La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l'époque de Philippe II, tome 2 / Armand Colin :383
Fernand Braudel / 1996 / Lépante: Bilan d'une bataille, In Autour de La Méditerranée / Editions de Fallois :291
볼프강 슈말레 / 2006 / 유럽의 재발견 - 신화와 정체성으로 보는 유럽의 역사 / 을유문화사 :15
V. J. Parry / 1980 / The Ottoman Empire, 1520~1566, In The New Cambridge Modern History, 제2권 / Cambridge University Press :510~516
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-001807194