지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
During the Korean War(1950∼1953), the tank was a decisive weapon system which dominated the battle field. The T-34 tank conducted decisive role as to drive the Republic of Korea (ROK)and the United States(US) Forces into the Line of defense, Nakdong River. On the other hand, during the counter-attack, the US Forces" tank troops seized the initiative.
And then the situation was changed when the Chinese Communist Forces (CCF) engaged. In that time, there were approximately 2,000 tanks of diverse model of 7 countries, the North Korean People Army (NKPA), US, United Kingdom, CCF, Canada, Philippine and ROK. Especially, the CCF operated approximately 400 tanks with 2 tank divisions. And it"s interesting because we normally regarded that they had used socalled "human-wave tactics". The ROK Armed Forces operated approximately 220 tanks with 3 tank battalions in 1953.
Making and addition, the ROK Armed Forces didn"t have any tank in 1950. But the NKPA had more than 150 tanks with 1 tank Brigade and 1 tank regiment. They attached the tank troops to the infantry division in order to operate tank troops by the axis.
The NKPA obtained great success by dispersing. But Basil Liddell Hart said "If the NKPA operated its tank troops in concentrating form like Heinz Guderian did in 1940. they could had dominated the Korean Peninsula before the ROK and US Forces secured the Line of Defense, Nakdong River.
And then, as the US Forces begun the counter-attack operation, their tank troops could dominate the battle field. They also operated tank troops in dispersing form. But it is worthy of notice that they came up with various operating model of the counter-attack, link-up operation, covering operation, withdrawal, reconnaissancein force, surprise attack which had been useful in the terrain of Korean Peninsula. Especially, the way of task organizing the infantry, tank and artillery units is the original form of the modern armed forces operation.
In the Korean war, the tank took a role of amain actor. Some students of military artsay that in the terrain of Korean Peninsula, tank is not appropriate one. But it"s not true. The analysis on the Korean War shows the tank conducted main role as to overcome terrain and swayed the direction of war finally. That"s the reason why many countries started to develop and improvea new type tank after the Korean War. The NKPA and ROK tried to promote the tank troops also. It has a influence both physical and psychological power.
From old time,the battle field condition had been changing. We should prepare new operating conception for the future operational environment. We should consider our battle reality like a limited battle space, high density of deployment, powerful obstacles. And we pursuit change and challenge.
The Korean War is a treasure house of the military doctrine. Thereare new trends of the Korean War study because confidential material of the USSR and CCF has been opening to the public. But the study on the role of tank is still in sufficient. I hope this study could be helpful to make clear the historical fact. The tank was the key factor to understand the Korean War.
And then the situation was changed when the Chinese Communist Forces (CCF) engaged. In that time, there were approximately 2,000 tanks of diverse model of 7 countries, the North Korean People Army (NKPA), US, United Kingdom, CCF, Canada, Philippine and ROK. Especially, the CCF operated approximately 400 tanks with 2 tank divisions. And it"s interesting because we normally regarded that they had used socalled "human-wave tactics". The ROK Armed Forces operated approximately 220 tanks with 3 tank battalions in 1953.
Making and addition, the ROK Armed Forces didn"t have any tank in 1950. But the NKPA had more than 150 tanks with 1 tank Brigade and 1 tank regiment. They attached the tank troops to the infantry division in order to operate tank troops by the axis.
The NKPA obtained great success by dispersing. But Basil Liddell Hart said "If the NKPA operated its tank troops in concentrating form like Heinz Guderian did in 1940. they could had dominated the Korean Peninsula before the ROK and US Forces secured the Line of Defense, Nakdong River.
And then, as the US Forces begun the counter-attack operation, their tank troops could dominate the battle field. They also operated tank troops in dispersing form. But it is worthy of notice that they came up with various operating model of the counter-attack, link-up operation, covering operation, withdrawal, reconnaissancein force, surprise attack which had been useful in the terrain of Korean Peninsula. Especially, the way of task organizing the infantry, tank and artillery units is the original form of the modern armed forces operation.
In the Korean war, the tank took a role of amain actor. Some students of military artsay that in the terrain of Korean Peninsula, tank is not appropriate one. But it"s not true. The analysis on the Korean War shows the tank conducted main role as to overcome terrain and swayed the direction of war finally. That"s the reason why many countries started to develop and improvea new type tank after the Korean War. The NKPA and ROK tried to promote the tank troops also. It has a influence both physical and psychological power.
From old time,the battle field condition had been changing. We should prepare new operating conception for the future operational environment. We should consider our battle reality like a limited battle space, high density of deployment, powerful obstacles. And we pursuit change and challenge.
The Korean War is a treasure house of the military doctrine. Thereare new trends of the Korean War study because confidential material of the USSR and CCF has been opening to the public. But the study on the role of tank is still in sufficient. I hope this study could be helpful to make clear the historical fact. The tank was the key factor to understand the Korean War.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 6·25전쟁시 단계별 전차운용
3. 6·25전쟁시 각 국가별 전차운용 특징
4. 전차가 전쟁에 미친 영향
5. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (91)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
청일전쟁 - 청측의 패인 분석
金舜圭
군사
1988
.08
6 · 25전쟁 초기 북한의 기동전략 실패원인에 대한 연구 : 기동전략의 개념, 세부유형, 수행방법을 중심으로
김대성
한국군사학논집
2018
.02
무기체계 운용형태를 고려한 운용가용도 설정 방안 연구
황경환
,
허장욱
한국신뢰성학회 학술대회논문집
2016
.05
주한 미 군사 고문단 (MILITARY ADVISORS IN KOREA : KMAG IN PEACE AND WAR) BY MAJOR ROBERT K. SAWYER
편집부
군사
1983
.12
한국전쟁 당시 중국개입의 예측실패에 관한 연구 : 미극동군사령부의 정보활동을 중심으로
李鍾判
,
小柳順一
군사
2008
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-001814757