메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이지은 (LH 토지주택연구원) 이성기 (LH 한국토지주택공사) 김지민 (LH 토지주택연구원)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第31卷 第8號
발행연도
2015.8
수록면
27 - 34 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The economic assessment of apartment buildings was added to the design competition evaluation item of 2014 in order to in order to relatively evaluate a well-planned as applied to the rational. These items will play an important role in reducing the construction cost for building the apartment complex. The purpose of this study is to check the design characteristics of apartment complex getting good score with the examination standard and the effectiveness of guideline through comparing to actual construction costs. The examination standards were chosen as underground parking space per a car, south-facing ratio of sunshine, minimizing the bending outer walls. They made the evaluation results to apply to five completed complex in from 2013 to 2014 with the similar items to evaluate alternatives of the actual design competition. Characteristic of only received a superior scoring is as follows. First, underground parking area per a car was only effective that parking lots could be arranged parallel or perpendicular when the axis of the designed apartment complex was unified. Second, the score maximizing the percentage of sunshine south-facing is high when there are many units facing southward if the floor area ratio is more than 190%. Third, in the case of south-facing ratio of sunshine, how to design the cornered unit of L-type buildings is a factor that increase the difference in scoring. The floor plan related to inner walls of units and common parts of buildings, i.e. staircases, elevators should be designed to remove the bending outer walls as much as possible. This study presents how to reduce the construction cost by design of buildings and underground parking, and check the fact that such design conditions are reflected in the design economic evaluation in LH housing competitions.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 설계경기 공모 및 당선안 평가방법
3. 설계경기안 경제성 평가방법
4. 사례단지 경제성 평가결과 비교
5. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (11)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0