지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper analyzed the ecological imagination and point of view in the movie 『Snowpiercer』(2013). The train, Snowpiercer, appeared after the ruin of the Earth, like a microcosm of today’s capitalism and a figure of as ‘Small world’. After Cw-7 radiation, a New Ice Age came to the Earth and it was transformed into a block of ice. All resources and food, water, soil, and natural resources have dried up and a variety of races and classes were featured in the film.
The hierarchies or social classes of the rooms at the tail section (Proletariat) and another sections (Bourgeois), namely seek the conquest of the water supply section and reflect Malthus’s theory on racism and the Holocaust. In addition, Social Darwinism and Totalitarianism and the aspects of violence by ecological fascism in this movie shows a Post-Apocalypse of the future. For example, Wilford’s final words of the movie are similar to the tragedy of commons theory by Garret Hardin, especially his intentional population reduction, murder, and genocide reflect (Neo-)malthusianism. These competitive exclusion principles include the zero population growth and birth control of Paul Ehrlich. Extreme political ecology, namely Ecofascism, that strive to restore the ecological imbalance can rule out human life.
Snowpiercer functions as a metaphor like ‘Noah’s Ark’ of Bible, in the sense that it shows the last competitive relationship between the survivors of human kind. However, we can see ‘Autopurification’ in its own nature from polar bears, Tommy, and Jona. The last scene of the movie represents a new start for the human beings of the future. In conclusion, this movie shows the interaction between humans and nature, especially technology and the nature of the ecological way forward. Karl Marx emphasized the relationship of humans and the Earth as ‘Stoffwechsel zwischen Mensch und Erde’, specifically, ‘the conduction of Humanism in nature’(‘der durchgefuhrte Humanismus der Natur’) and ‘the naturalistic nature of man’(‘der durchgefuhrte Naturalismus des Menschen’).
The hierarchies or social classes of the rooms at the tail section (Proletariat) and another sections (Bourgeois), namely seek the conquest of the water supply section and reflect Malthus’s theory on racism and the Holocaust. In addition, Social Darwinism and Totalitarianism and the aspects of violence by ecological fascism in this movie shows a Post-Apocalypse of the future. For example, Wilford’s final words of the movie are similar to the tragedy of commons theory by Garret Hardin, especially his intentional population reduction, murder, and genocide reflect (Neo-)malthusianism. These competitive exclusion principles include the zero population growth and birth control of Paul Ehrlich. Extreme political ecology, namely Ecofascism, that strive to restore the ecological imbalance can rule out human life.
Snowpiercer functions as a metaphor like ‘Noah’s Ark’ of Bible, in the sense that it shows the last competitive relationship between the survivors of human kind. However, we can see ‘Autopurification’ in its own nature from polar bears, Tommy, and Jona. The last scene of the movie represents a new start for the human beings of the future. In conclusion, this movie shows the interaction between humans and nature, especially technology and the nature of the ecological way forward. Karl Marx emphasized the relationship of humans and the Earth as ‘Stoffwechsel zwischen Mensch und Erde’, specifically, ‘the conduction of Humanism in nature’(‘der durchgefuhrte Humanismus der Natur’) and ‘the naturalistic nature of man’(‘der durchgefuhrte Naturalismus des Menschen’).
목차
1. 들어가며
2. 작은 세계
3. 물, 불, 땅
4. (신)맬더스주의
5. 사회진화론과 생태파시즘
6. 나오며 : 새로운 생태주의
〈인용문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
설국열차의 과학기술 · 계급지배 시스템과 윤리적 해방의 비전
한국민족문화
2015 .02
-
평등의 몰락에 대한 영화적 대응과 의미 - 영화 <설국열차>와 <기생충>을 중심으로 -
비평문학
2020 .03
-
‘설국열차’의 꼬리 칸에서
수필미학
2020 .06
-
<설국열차>의 권력과 혁명 서사 고찰
탐라문화
2022 .07
-
<설국열차>의 서사구조에 나타난 행동자에 대하여
한국학연구
2016 .03
-
마르크스를 읽기 위한 하나의 가이드
황해문화
2021 .09
-
마르크스가 경제학에 관해 말해주는 것들
철학과 현실
2018 .06
-
마르크스의 종교비판
철학과 현실
2018 .06
-
마르크스 물질대사론의 생태학적 함의
시대와 철학
2024 .09
-
이상 시에 나타난 생태적 상상력
한국시학회 학술대회 논문집
2021 .12
-
로봇시대와 마르크스 그리고 도덕성
철학과 현실
2019 .09
-
칼 마르크스의 유산
철학과 현실
2018 .06
-
생태시의 치유적 상상력 교육에 관한 연구
문학치료연구
2019 .01
-
마르크스의 초기 저작과 함께 『자본론』 읽기
동서인문
2018 .10
-
마르크스와 역사 -탄생 200주년에 다시 돌아봄-
서양사론
2018 .12
-
칼 마르크스의 종교론에 관한 비판적 연구
동서철학연구
2019 .01
-
마르크스의 현재성을 다시 생각한다 : 난민, 상품, 그리고 법
철학과 현실
2018 .06
-
생태시를 활용한 대학 생태문학교육의 방향
문학과환경
2022 .12
-
환상 열차
숙명문학
2021 .11
-
3+1 생태정치학의 새로운 구도와 생태 전환의 상상력
문화과학
2024 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-810-001602543