메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교학회 한국기독교신학논총 한국기독교신학논총 제90집
발행연도
2013.12
수록면
115 - 142 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to establish a desirable Christology in the Korean context. In this article, I studied Christology in the context of both western theology and Latin American liberation theology. For this comparative study, I selected Paul Tillich from the context of western theologians and Leonardo Boff from the context of liberation theologians. More specifically, I compared the existential Christology of Paul Tillich with the liberation Christology of Leonardo Boff. Tillich`s Christology has similarities and some differences with Boff`s Christology. One can learn from and influence on the other. Both start from human situation. In this sense their study of Christology can be called ‘Christology from below.’ However, Tillich place an emphasis on the human existential situation while Boff on the social, political, and economic situation. Tillich understands Jesus Christ as the New Being in a existential dimension of human being while Boff understands Jesus Christ as the liberator in a total dimension of human being. In my opinion, Boff`s Christology is more persuasive to the modern situation than Tillich`s, because it is impossible to grasp the complicated situations of human being today from the existentialist perspective. In conclusion, there is a need of mutual dialogue and learning from two Christologies in a more active way. That is, Tillich`s Christology can learn a socio-historical perspective from Boff`s. On the contrary, Boff`s Christology can learn a systematic methodology of theology from Tillich`s. Furthermore, both have to be reinterpreted and developed through the dialogue of other contextualized theologies in a non Western world. This article also suggested many challenges which must be undertaken. These challenges include the need for more systematic research to the problems of the traditional Christologies in connection with the context on Korean church. I hope the comparative study performed in this article will contribute to the formulation of Korean Christology.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0