지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study pursues when the twelve-tribe system that stands for all the Israelites could be institutionalized in the history of ancient Israel. This issue involves discussing several complicate subjects like the significance of the Merneptah`s “Israel,” the appropriate understanding of tribalism, the time of the full blown state, and a critical dating of the tribal lists. (1) The significance of the Merneptah`s “Israel,” as a Egyptian royal propaganda, indicates a tribal coalition. It probably maintained a social security for the newly found settlements which appeared from the thirteenth century BCE in the central highland of Canaan. (2) Given Robert B. Coote`s twelve generalities and E. J. van der Steen`s four characterizations on tribalism, the Israelite tribal society had been always there with the rise and the fall of the monarchy. And the biblical reference on tribal lists were written by the monarchic court for certain ideological purpose of the ruling house(s). (3) Current state of research on the emergence of the state tends to see that the full blown state system could be reached at the period from the late ninth century BCE to the middle of the eighth century BCE, but not before. (4) Based on the arguments above, the critical estimation of the date of the nine tribal lists in the Old Testament shows that all are inappropriate for the starting point of institutionalizing the twelve-tribe system. A terminus a quo and a terminus ad quem for the institution alization of the twelve-tribe system could be during the Omride and the Jehuid dynasty in the ninth and eighth century BCE. But the Jehuid dynasty could be a more positive candidate for the institutionalization of the twelve-tribe system, based on the two circumstances. The external one comes from the long strife with the Aramaean. The internal one comes from a political need to comfort the tribal life disenfranchised by the Omride politics. Therefore we may conclude that as pre-deuteronomistic tradition, Elisha`s twelve oxen (1King 19:19-21) in the episodes of the Jehuid apology could be the most appropriate, though not the earliest, locus for the institutionalization of the twelve-tribe system in the history of ancient Israel. That scene symbolizes the social integration of the tribal society under one political regime, the Jehuid.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (63)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 김유기 / 2005 / 고대 이스라엘 / 한국신학연구소
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 우택주 / 2008 / 레위인의 사회적 기원과 제사장 역할의 재평가 / 한국기독교신학논총 (58) : 27 ~ 47
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 우택주 / 2010 / 초기 이스라엘의 가나안 정착모델에 관한 최근 연구동향 / 복음과 실천 46 : 9 ~ 34
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 우택주 / 2011 / 구약성서 법전에 나타난 ‘공정한 사회론’의 허와 실 / 구약논단 17 (3) : 34 ~ 53
5. [단행본] - 이기백 / 1990 / 韓國史新論 / 일조각
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 우택주 / 2008 / 레위인의 사회적 기원과 제사장 역할의 재평가 / 한국기독교신학논총 (58) : 27 ~ 47
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 우택주 / 2010 / 초기 이스라엘의 가나안 정착모델에 관한 최근 연구동향 / 복음과 실천 46 : 9 ~ 34
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 우택주 / 2011 / 구약성서 법전에 나타난 ‘공정한 사회론’의 허와 실 / 구약논단 17 (3) : 34 ~ 53
5. [단행본] - 이기백 / 1990 / 韓國史新論 / 일조각
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0