지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study explores how the problems of the literary unity of Philippians and the place of Paul`s imprisonment are solved by means of J-F. Lyotard`s ``postmodern`` interpretation paradigm which is designed to overcome limits of modern historiography, modern theological logic, and modern hermeneutic principle. For this purpose, this study explores the recent issue of the unity of Philippians, whether it was composed all at once as a unified form, or it was originally written by editing three different fragments into unified form. From postmodern viewpoint, it is conceived that the major factor in solving the issue of the unity of Philippippians is the postmodern interpretation of the rule of ``language game`` formulated by the interrelating contract among the addressor, the addressee, and reference rather than the historical-critical reconstruction of the author Paul`s situation. Lyotard`s postmodern interpretation paradigm strongly encourages the dramatic upheaval of the new paradigm which was stimulated by the ``paralogy`` between ``narrative knowledge`` and ``scientific knowledge``. Following this suggestion, we can discover that both the fragments writing theory based upon historical-critical method and the unification writing theory based upon rhetorical critical method and genre criticism are not established by ``scientific knowledge`` of rigorous historical facts, but by ``narrative knowledge`` of the narrative situation between the addressor and the addressee which was, through the contracted rules of language game, reconstructed by the narrative of Philippians and Acts. In conclusion, we also propose new interpretation paradigm of determining the unity of Philippians, the date of writing Philippians, and the place of writing Philippians. According to this paradigm, it is likely that Paul created Ur-Philippians by editing three fragments just before he died, while his disciples reedited Ur-Philippians so that Philippians was apparently written at Rome.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
빌립보서 2장 6-11절의 최근 연구동향 : 형식, 배경사, 신학적 윤리를 중심으로
김덕기
장신논단
2012
.04
바울의 실존적 투쟁에 나타난 죽음 이해와 종말론 : 빌립보서 1장 21-24절의 주석을 중심으로
김덕기
신학논단
2012
.12
빌립보서 2:10의 한글 번역에 대한 석의적 고찰
조충현
성경원문연구
2010
.10
슐라이어마허의 보편해석학의 고린도전서 9장 주석에의 적용 ― 바울의 역설적 자유의 종교사상을 중심으로
김덕기
한국기독교신학논총
2022
.04
바울의 로마제국에 대한 정치적 태도와 정치신학 : 빌립보서 1:27-30과 3:20-21을 중심으로
김덕기
신약논단
2010
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0