메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교학회 한국기독교신학논총 한국기독교신학논총 제79집
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
135 - 154 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper provides a critical review of Leonardo Boff`s model of perichoresis-communion, with which he seeks a transformation in social relations amist economic inequality and political oppression. Placing his model in the context of contemporary renaissance of the doctrine of the Trinity, this paper analyses and reappraises his dealings with the relation between the Trinity and society. In so doing, this paper argues that Boff`s own theological limitations lurking in his discussion on the relation between the Trinity and society finally betray his "social project" or "liberation program." Boff`s understanding of the Trinity is remarkably characterized by his emphasis on perichoresis, which means complete communion among the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. According to Boff, such perichoresis could imply not only Filioque (and from the Son), but also Patreque (and from the Father) and Spirituque (and from the Spirit). This complete communion of perichoresis becomes "the basic thesis" or "the structuring principle" for his discussion. With these Boff has a theological prospect that faith in the Holy Trinity would be able to unleash its liberating potential in society. However, a meticulous review of Boff`s discussion on the relation between the economic Trinity and the immanent Trinity shows that, despite his original intension to accept Rahner`s rule of identity, he unavoidably leads to introducing a gap between them, which, in turn, comes to loosen a close link, correlation, or correspondence between them. Thus, for him, the immanent Trinity is much more than the economic Trinity. And Boff states that the mystery of the Trinity is partially, not fully, manifested to us, and that the economic Trinity provides merely glimpses of the immanent Trinity. Another careful reading of Boff`s discussion on the economic-immanent Trinity relation reveals that his prominent concentration on the unfathomable mystery lurks in his discussion on the Trinity and thus betrays his own theological prospect. In brief, Boff`s strong focus on the mystery of the Trinity makes an impact on his position which opens a wide gap between the immanent and the economic Trinity. And this gap, in turn, finally betrays his "social project" or "liberation program."

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0