메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교학회 한국기독교신학논총 한국기독교신학논총 제76집
발행연도
2011.7
수록면
149 - 170 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Thielicke develops a thought of theological ethics based on the Reformational doctrine of justification. The distinctiveness of his ethics consists in that it is not a norm ethics but a hermeneutics of ethical reality. It can be called an ethics of compromise. Thielicke views the change of the being must precede the ethical action. The ethical act is the mark following the fact of justification. Thielicke defines Christian ethics not as a norm ethics but as a hermeneutics of ethical reality. Theological ethics is an interpretation of reality. It is namely to show the human, which is the being in the world, in the middle of his status and world order, and in the his conflict and his limitation situation. Thielicke intends to set up a casuistic rules for every situation. He, instead, intends to suggest diverse behavior way based on theological principles by suggesting one model. God has revised his unconditional will considering the human fall in the history. This is the accommodation of God. The accommodation as compromise is the providence of God`s salvation history. God`s accommodation is realized by the act that He accommodates himself to this world in order to redeem the fallen world and carries out in endurance for himself. The accommodation is carried out by giving the law as the old covenant and the Gospel as the new covenant. The event of humiliation of God to lower himself to the level of human eye is God`s compromise. Thielicke`s ethics is characterized neither as norm ethics nor as situation ethics but as pneumatological one. His ethics begins neither with a norm nor nullifies the norm by considering situation to be important, but intends to understand the spontaneity the Holy Spirit causes as a reference of behaviors confronting the concrete situation. Thielicke views there is a certain "kasuistisches Minimum." Casuistic does not exist, but casuistic minimum exists. His ethics of compromise is relevant for Korean society, in which the radical polarization of conflicts has appeared in the region of parliament, industry, school and even in the church.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0