지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.11
- 수록면
- 397 - 407 (11page)
- DOI
- 10.51979/KSSLS.2014.11.58.397
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research is intended for modeling of classification of sprots related occupation comparing in Australia and Korea and aid to give a fundamental for setting the standdar sports occupation classification table, and to elevate the status of sports related jobs in Korea, so we researched this through comparing the case in Australia.
This is an aggregate of the reports about occupation sociologya nd specializing the instructors of sports for all, from 1993 to 2014, research papers and current statistic adl ata and so on. So we found these conclusions below using Korean Standard Occupation Classification.
First, sports related jobs as the Korean Standard Occupation Classification defined, are most likely concerned to the major elite sports jobs, school sports, and some other opsitions to support those. According to this situation, the problems are, firstly, we need to define the jobs related to “school sports”. Secondly, we need to broaden the meaning of the elite sports. Thirdly, we have to add the section for sports for all. and fourthly, except elite sports and school sports, other definition of sports fields are ambiguous.
Second, as following the Korean Standard Occupation Classificaiotn system, we set the form of the field for sports for all. Big category of the occupations is like this〈table 4〉. And the sub-classification will be shown as below.
This is an aggregate of the reports about occupation sociologya nd specializing the instructors of sports for all, from 1993 to 2014, research papers and current statistic adl ata and so on. So we found these conclusions below using Korean Standard Occupation Classification.
First, sports related jobs as the Korean Standard Occupation Classification defined, are most likely concerned to the major elite sports jobs, school sports, and some other opsitions to support those. According to this situation, the problems are, firstly, we need to define the jobs related to “school sports”. Secondly, we need to broaden the meaning of the elite sports. Thirdly, we have to add the section for sports for all. and fourthly, except elite sports and school sports, other definition of sports fields are ambiguous.
Second, as following the Korean Standard Occupation Classificaiotn system, we set the form of the field for sports for all. Big category of the occupations is like this〈table 4〉. And the sub-classification will be shown as below.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 우리나라 체육관련 직업분류
Ⅲ. 호주의 체육관련 직업분류
Ⅳ. 한국과 호주의 체육관련 직업분류 비교 및 시사점
Ⅴ. 사회체육 직업분류 표준화 모델
Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (41)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
일본 스포츠정책에 관한 연구 : 스포츠청의 설립 경위와 그 운영체제
김영성
한국체육과학회지
2017
.08
한국 프로야구 타자의 경기력요인 분석
양도업
,
조은형
,
배상우
외 1명
한국사회체육학회지
2015
.05
스포츠이벤트의 서비스품질과 개최도시의 이미지, 평판 및 재방문의사의 구조적 관계 : 중ㆍ소도시의 스포츠이벤트를 중심으로
박진기
,
박상윤
한국사회체육학회지
2015
.05
국민생활체육 전국종목별연합회 발전을 위한 정책요소 및 우선순위
김진영
,
박진경
한국사회체육학회지
2015
.05
스포츠센터 참가자의 사회적지지, 정신건강 및 사회적응의 관계
선우유영
,
류양섭
,
한용재
한국사회체육학회지
2015
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0