지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 565 - 573 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) launched an Acute Myocardial Infarction(AMI) assessment for the Payment For Performance(Quality Incentives) Pilot Project from July 2007. Assessment measures of AMI were composed of five process measures and one outcome measure, and each measure was incorporated into one composite quality score to Pay for Performance. Method: For calculation of composite quality score, we considered weighting for the measures using the Delphi method. The questionnaire was composed of three measure groups, ‘Reperfusion rate’(Fibrolytic therapy received within 60 minutes of hospital arrival, Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention within 120 minutes of hospital arrival), ‘Medication prescription rate’(Aspirin at arrival, Aspirin prescribed at discharge, Beta-blocker prescribed at discharge) and ‘Survival Index’(30-day mortality rate). Result: A panel composed of 18 and completed a questionnaire by allocation of 10 scores to the three above mentioned measure groups. The Delphi was carried out until three rounds of surveys. In conclusion, each measure group was weighted differently and the 10 scores were allocated as 4.5 to ‘Reperfusion rate’, 2.5 to ‘Medication prescription rate’, and 3.0 to ‘Survival Index’. Conclusion: The results of this study proposed the calculation method for weighting of Acute Myocardial Infarction quality indicators.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구 방법
Ⅲ. 연구 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
References
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Antman E. M. / 2004 / ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction) / Circulation 110 (9) : 588 ~ 636
2. [인터넷자원] - Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services / / CMS Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Project - Composite Quality Score Methodology Overview
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Chang, L. / 2002 / The NHS Performance Assessment Framework: A “balanced scorecard” approach? / Journal of Management in Medicine 16 (5) : 345 ~ 358
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Dalkey, N. C. / 1970 / The Delphi Method, III : Use of Self-ratings to Improve Group Estimates / Technolgical Forecasting 1 : 283 ~ 291
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - De Vet, E / 2005 / Determinants of forward stage transitions: a Delphi study / Health Education Research 20 (2) : 195 ~ 205
2. [인터넷자원] - Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services / / CMS Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Project - Composite Quality Score Methodology Overview
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Chang, L. / 2002 / The NHS Performance Assessment Framework: A “balanced scorecard” approach? / Journal of Management in Medicine 16 (5) : 345 ~ 358
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Dalkey, N. C. / 1970 / The Delphi Method, III : Use of Self-ratings to Improve Group Estimates / Technolgical Forecasting 1 : 283 ~ 291
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - De Vet, E / 2005 / Determinants of forward stage transitions: a Delphi study / Health Education Research 20 (2) : 195 ~ 205
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-512-001298926