메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국사회체육학회 한국사회체육학회지 한국사회체육학회지 제49권 제2호
발행연도
2012.8
수록면
919 - 928 (10page)
DOI
10.51979/KSSLS.2012.08.49.919

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to investigate effects of rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of patients with coronary artery diseases based on beta blocker administration on exercise intensity and safety. The subjects of this study were patients with coronary artery diseases undergoing medical intervention procedure, who were divided into those who were administered of beta blockers (group A, n=41) and who were not (group B, n=42). They were conducted of exercise stress test, for measuring the HR, the VO2, and RER based on the RPE. The results of this study showed that %HR showed no difference between group A and group B in %HRmax, %VO2max, and %RERmax, when the RPE was 11 (somewhat). The %VO2 was significantly higher in group A than group B (p<.05). The RER showed no difference between group A and B. When the RPE was 13 (some hard), the %HR and the %VO2 were significantly higher in group B than A, respectively (p<.05). There was no difference in the %RER between the two groups. When the RPE was 15 (hard), the %HR, the %VO2, and the %RER were significantly higher in group B than group A, respectively (p<.05). As for the percentage based on the HRR 85% as safety limit of exercise intensity, the exercise intensity showed no difference between A and B when the RPE was 11, while A (82.4±8.3%, 94.0±7.2 %) was significantly higher than B (86.5 ±8.3%, 98.5±5.3%) when the RPE was 13 and 15, respectively (p <.05). As for the percentage based on the VO2R85% as safety limit of exercise intensity, the exercise intensity was significantly higher in group B (70.7± 11.1%, 85.7±9.4%) than A (63.4±12.3%, 78.9±10.1%) when the RPE was 13 and 15, respectively (p<.05). Conclusively, the RPE 11 was appropriate both for group A and B in the effective limit, but the patients of group A may be recommended to be around 16 scales of the RPE safety limit and those of group B may be recommended to be 15 scales of the RPE.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0