지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This essay tries to do a comparative study between the sentence patterns of 있다 which indicate the existence in Korean and the existential sentences in Chinese. The part of speech of 있다 can be divided into three groups: Verbs, Adjectives and Auxiliary Verbs. In the actual translation, according to the different parts of speech, the sentence patterns of 있다 can be translated as “?”, “有”, “在”, “V+着”, and so on. From the syntactic perspective, the sentence patterns of 있다 are often used in combination with other auxiliary words, act as attributive, adverbial, subject, predicate and other ingredients in the sentences. However, in translation, “?”, “有”, “在”, “V+着” can only serve as the predicate and object.
Furthermore, the location word must be appeared in front of the predicate in Korean, while according to the different semantics, Chinese locative words sometimes are in front of the predicate, sometimes are located behind the predicate. From the semantic and pragmatic point of view, Korean and Chinese existential sentences are roughly same, but we must consider the arrangement of word order and semantic context as well as the transformation of parts of the sentence.
Furthermore, the location word must be appeared in front of the predicate in Korean, while according to the different semantics, Chinese locative words sometimes are in front of the predicate, sometimes are located behind the predicate. From the semantic and pragmatic point of view, Korean and Chinese existential sentences are roughly same, but we must consider the arrangement of word order and semantic context as well as the transformation of parts of the sentence.
목차
＜中??抄?＞
Ⅰ. 引言
Ⅱ. 表示存在的“-있다”句式
Ⅲ. ?中存?句???比
Ⅳ. ??
【參考文獻】
＜Abstract＞
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-001-001255747