지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 전북대학교 산업경제연구소 Asia-Pacific Journal of Business & Commerce Asia-Pacific Journal of Business & Commerce 아태경상저널 제6권 제2호
- 발행연도
- 2014.8
- 수록면
- 57 - 69 (13page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Through bringing together experts from civil society, government and military, the Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) was established to make defense acquisition projects more efficient by promoting democratic decision-making, reduce the chance for corruption, and place the projects under more public scrutiny. However, the recent controversies surrounding the Korea Fighter Experimental (KFX) project, the South Korean military acquisition program to indigenously develop an advanced multi-role fighter jet, have revealed that the increased democracy in the military acquisition through the DAPA may have led to increased conflict of interests among the project’s stakeholders. This study suggests that the dragging on of the KFX project has been due to the difficulties with conflict management. The difficulties of the KFX project have been: 1) the lack of superordinate goal among the stakeholders, 2) competitive reward system under highly interdependent acquisition process, 3) failure to build trust.This study recommends establishing a control tower dedicated to conflict management from the project planning phase. This control tower will work to align and integrate the interests of the stakeholders, and should be endowed with authority and leadership to enforce coordination of stakeholder action.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. The Significance of the DAPA
3. The Dragging-on of the KFX Project and its Controversies
4. Why the KFX Project Needs Conflict Management
5. Frame: Conflict and Conflict Management
6. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-323-001078652