지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.8
- 수록면
- 4,791 - 4,840 (50page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examines the value relevance of loan loss provisions (LLP). Prior studies find that banks` discretionary LLP (DLLP) are perceived positively by the market and attribute this to greater LLP signaling to investors the soundness of the bank. However, these studies are based on data from the pre-Basel era when LLP increased Tier 1 capital and thus had positive implications. We focus on the post-Basel period in which LLP does not affect Tier 1 capital and apply a better specified model to test for the value relevance of loan loss provisions. We find that DLLP is not value relevant in the post-Basel period. This result is consistent throughout the recent financial crisis, which is contrary to Ryan`s (2011) conjecture that DLLP may be valued positively during economic downturn. In addition, LLP and nondiscretionary LLP (NLLP) are perceived negatively by the market. We also show that findings in the long-window value relevance test still hold in the short-window market reaction test. Overall, in the post-Basel period, DLLP provides no value relevant information whereas NLLP conveys value relevant information incremental to earnings.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0