지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.1
- 수록면
- 144 - 147 (4page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Annually, the U.S. government provides millions of dollars in capital improvement projects to agencies in order to reduce losses associated with natural disasters. To be eligible for federal funding, a project must be “cost effective” as demonstrated through a benefit-cost analysis (BCA). To establish the “cost” used in the analysis, an engineer must define the scope of work, perform preliminary engineering, and develop an estimated project cost. This preliminary project development work must be funded up-front by the requesting agency, but, ideally, agencies would like to know before they authorize development funds whether the proposed mitigation project is likely to be cost effective. This paper examines indicators that can be used to investigate a project’s cost effectiveness prior to authorizing preliminary development funds. The indicators include project useful life, mitigation project cost, and recurrence interval of the disaster. An equation was developed to represent the expected benefit-cost ratio (BCR), and a sensitivity analysis was performed to determine how sensitive the BCR was to changes in each indicator. These indicators can be used by agencies to determine whether to proceed with preliminary project development. Ultimately, this paper may contribute to improving the image of construction industry by providing simplified cost effective indicators.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Ⅱ. METHODOLOGY
Ⅲ. CONCLUSIONS
Ⅳ. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-530-000944709