지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Purpose of this review is to establish the concept of “publicness” which is applicable to health area and to discuss the degree of publicness in Korean healthcare or health policy. Traditionally, public refers to something related to government. However, as Habermas systemized the concept of “public sphere” in 1962, it became to embrace room between the market and the government. In this article, publicness is defined as a character that is emerging when a group of people or an organization does certain kinds of activities in pursuit of public interest with procedural justice through participation of many people. The authority to do these activities can be committed to another specific entity(e.g. government), and committed entity’s activities are considered as public. Still, civic participation matters. Healthcare pursues public interest ? improvement of health rights of society members ? and the principal bodies of healthcare are the government and the citizens. In procedural perspective, though lack of participation of citizens, the government as committed subject exercise powerful authority on health care service providers for justice. From this view, private organizations or institutions can have publicness, but the ceiling of that is lower than public owned organizations/institutions, because of other characteristics of public organizations as Thompkins(2005) maintained. To fortify specified functions and roles for public institutions, they should enhance procedural and contentual publicness through their features only public organizations/ institutions can have. Also, they should develop tools to measure their publicness.
목차
Abstract
서론
본론
결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-517-000925267