지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 263 - 276 (14page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In its architectural design curriculum, the UNO Group of the Paris-Belleville School of Architecture is characterized by utilizing three-dimensional models on a small scale, called figure, with achromatic and primary colors from the 1980s. The three-dimensional form of expression of figure is fundamentally different from ordinary program?diagram models with a similar form in that the latter tend to express the three-dimensional composition of functions with free form in relation to the concept of projects, while the former complies with composition law of figure based on the UNO Group’s unique theory on space in modern architecture and expresses conceptual implications abstractly.
Figure has its existential value as part of the key methodologies that realize ultimate goals of the UNO Group’s education, which assumes perception about architectural space as the most prioritized topic of architectural education. Figure is obtained through education over a certain period in architecture studios based on the UNO group’s simple text explaining the basic principles of figure, and therefore it is difficult to identify a clear educational content for figure in practical terms. Such ambiguity in the formal aspects is likely to trigger confusion among students who receive education on the spot, and literature complementing a more systematic explanation is considered necessary. This study examined compositional methods and fundamentals of figure and is meaningful as providing basic data to develop educational manuals related to figure in UNO studios.
Figure has its existential value as part of the key methodologies that realize ultimate goals of the UNO Group’s education, which assumes perception about architectural space as the most prioritized topic of architectural education. Figure is obtained through education over a certain period in architecture studios based on the UNO group’s simple text explaining the basic principles of figure, and therefore it is difficult to identify a clear educational content for figure in practical terms. Such ambiguity in the formal aspects is likely to trigger confusion among students who receive education on the spot, and literature complementing a more systematic explanation is considered necessary. This study examined compositional methods and fundamentals of figure and is meaningful as providing basic data to develop educational manuals related to figure in UNO studios.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
III. 피규어의 이론적 고찰
IV. 피규어의 프로젝트 적용
V. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (8)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Alain Dervieux / / Trente mètres par trente」;un enseignement moderne du projet moderne / Ecole d’architecture de Paris-Belleville : 4 ~ 30
2. [단행본] - Henri Ciriani / 1996 / Pratique de la piece urbain: ma petite utopie / Ed. du Pavillon de l’Arsenal : 11 ~ 42
3. [단행본] - Henri Ciriani / 1984 / UNO / Enseignemet et Patique : 27 ~
4. [단행본] - Colin Rowe / 1968 / Transparency : Literal and Phenomenal / Birkhauser
5. [단행본] - Colin Rowe / 1997 / 근대건축론집 / 세진사 : 184 ~ 209
2. [단행본] - Henri Ciriani / 1996 / Pratique de la piece urbain: ma petite utopie / Ed. du Pavillon de l’Arsenal : 11 ~ 42
3. [단행본] - Henri Ciriani / 1984 / UNO / Enseignemet et Patique : 27 ~
4. [단행본] - Colin Rowe / 1968 / Transparency : Literal and Phenomenal / Birkhauser
5. [단행본] - Colin Rowe / 1997 / 근대건축론집 / 세진사 : 184 ~ 209
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-595-000938248