지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 279 - 302 (24page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In All My Sons Miller highlights Joe Keller’s unethical crime that claimed twenty-one young pilots. Joe arguably has no viable connection with his world. He criticizes Joe’s unrelatedness and his irresponsibility for the other. In contrast to his father, Chris pursues an idealistic morality of brotherhood. Chris’s transcendental love for the other is pitted against his father’s narrow family-centricism. Chris’s ethics comes closer to Levinasian philosophy that stresses the hospitality of the other and absolute responsibility for the other.
Miller sees this world as a jungle existence as shown by Joe’s family-centered values and his distorted entrepreneurship. Levinas warns us of the reality of the world in which the other becomes a faceless face in the crowd and the death of somebody becomes a matter of indifference. Miller also shows a similar diagnosis that the absence of concernfulness for the other will result in tragic catastrophe in human society.
In this play Miller asserts that an individual should assume full responsibility for the other in terms of brotherhood as an active ethics. Interestingly enough, his ethics shares much in common with Levinas’s philosophy of otherness. In that aspect this paper explores the violence of the same and the forgetting of the other through Levinasian philosophy in this play.
Miller sees this world as a jungle existence as shown by Joe’s family-centered values and his distorted entrepreneurship. Levinas warns us of the reality of the world in which the other becomes a faceless face in the crowd and the death of somebody becomes a matter of indifference. Miller also shows a similar diagnosis that the absence of concernfulness for the other will result in tragic catastrophe in human society.
In this play Miller asserts that an individual should assume full responsibility for the other in terms of brotherhood as an active ethics. Interestingly enough, his ethics shares much in common with Levinas’s philosophy of otherness. In that aspect this paper explores the violence of the same and the forgetting of the other through Levinasian philosophy in this play.
목차
I. 서론
II. 현대 사회의 신의 죽음과 불확실성
III. 가족적 이기주의와 동일성의 폭력
IV. 타자의 망각과 책임의 윤리의식
V. 레비나스 철학과 타자의 얼굴
VI. 결론
인용 문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-842-001022698