지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第224輯
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 31 - 53 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.16912/khr.2014.12.224.31
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In traditional era chroniclers did not always write suiting power’s taste in spite of patronage, inversely modern history as a distinct discipline never deviated exceedingly from social, and even political demands. Nevertheless history as a separate discipline have achieved some relative independence from the state power and civil society, and have accomplished very rich and abundant outcomes copping with etatisme or nationalism. One of the most remarkable instances is the historiography of French Revolution, especially the ‘classical’ interpretation about it. However historical studies have not being done in a vacuum, ultimately never overcoming its nature of ‘ideologie d’Etat’. In cases which historical studies exceed that maximum envelope in spite of public support and funding, the relative autonomy given to Academia is plainly discarded and, in extreme circumstances, debates disclose bluntly their character of ideology disregarding its ‘scientific’ norm. One of the coup de theatre is Francois Furet’s defiance and diatribe on Albert Soboul. In this case, we witness that Public Sphere at domestic and international level played in the long run a role as a final judge. Therefore we have to put together, not only the inner, but also external dimensions of Academia, not merely the effects of state power, but power relations of social forces, in order to understand properly the real worth of historical interpretations.
목차
Ⅰ. 문명사적 개관
Ⅱ. 프랑스혁명이라는 분수령
Ⅲ. 프랑스혁명 연구의 추세
Ⅳ. 혁명의 정치학, 정치의 혁명학
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-000979550