지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第223輯
- 발행연도
- 2014.9
- 수록면
- 27 - 54 (28page)
- DOI
- 10.16912/khr.2014.09.223.27
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper tries to examine the works presented between 2012~2013 based on “the continuous understanding of premodern-modern” and “East Asian perspective”. As regards to the continuous understanding of premodern-modern, it is very significant to approach in a way that pursuit the relativization of “a developing view of the history or the value of Eurocentrism and perspective of Modernocentrism”. Because premodern and modern has been understood in a disconnected way in non-western history based on Eurocentrism·Modernocentrism, also the perspective that connect the “inheritance of premodern” to modern has been closed. In the past when the phenomenon in western modern period can be found Joseon Dynasty, it was easily to be defined as “premodern” as it was happened before “western impact” or the acceptance of west in academia of Korean history. This is a result of combination of Eurocentrism and Modernocentrism.
As regards to East Asian perspective, it is necessary to have a very clear critical mind of what and how can be newly looked over. It could also be understood in a transnational correlation as the process of building the modern nation-states has a close relation to the modern Empire. Or it could be a history method which form East Asian history by exploring combination of tradition and modern, universal and individual in post-modern context. However, it is only possible to get a progressive comprehension in an argument that based on more clear critical mind and point of view.
As regards to East Asian perspective, it is necessary to have a very clear critical mind of what and how can be newly looked over. It could also be understood in a transnational correlation as the process of building the modern nation-states has a close relation to the modern Empire. Or it could be a history method which form East Asian history by exploring combination of tradition and modern, universal and individual in post-modern context. However, it is only possible to get a progressive comprehension in an argument that based on more clear critical mind and point of view.
목차
I. 머리말
Ⅱ. 전근대-근대의 연속적 이해
Ⅲ. 동아시아라는 시각
Ⅳ. 새로운 동학농민전쟁상의 모색
Ⅴ. 맺음말
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (92)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0