메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김진관 (한국국제대학교) 하병주 (경상대학교) 이병호 (경상대학교)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제11권 제3호 (통권 제22호)
발행연도
2013.9
수록면
19 - 27 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The insulation efficacy of a bubble sheet that many press releases have been produced in the reality and that the building energy saving acts as a big social issue was intended to be compared.
As a result, the following came to conclusions.
As a result of measuring heat transmission coefficient of 4 kinds of experimental materials, it was found: 10mm styrofoam was 1.969W/m2K: double bubble sheet was 3.29W/m2K: single-layered bubble sheet was 3.92W/m2K: a bubble sheet for packaging was 4.534W/m2K.
Looking at the phenomenon showing the effect of energy saving at general homes even though the heat transmission coefficient of single-layered bubble sheet is around double of the 10mm styrofoam, it showed that the building energy saving can take big effects when insulation efficacy of glass is improved a little with technology development.
-As a result of making and measuring a hexahedral specimen assuming Mock Up House, when the difference of external temperature was 6.0℃, it was found: the variation of temperature of a styrofoam specimen was 4.2℃: double bubble sheet was 4.8℃: single-layered bubble sheet was 5.1℃: a bubble sheet for packaging was 5.5℃. It obviously showed the differences between insulation performance of all sorts of bubble sheet and 10mm styrofoam in the results from the specimen.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 실험방법
Ⅲ. 실험 결과 및 분석
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-590-002805945