지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Men have designed representative system to realize “res publica” through deliberation of a legislative bill and our Consistutional law Article 40 defines legislation rights to the National Assembly, which is the decision making organization based on the representative system. Legislation process in House around ‘Sewol ferry’ disaster went differently from the purpose of representative system, though. It’s been based on the “agreement”, between the Government and the Opposition parties, not through the deliberation of each member of National Assembly. Only very few representatives from each party made up their own agreement through more than 3 times trials, still not reflecting the opinions of all the people, stakeholders of the special laws and members of the National Assembly and this kind of highly disputable bill can ruin many of other proposed laws and whole of regular proceedings, we learned again. It’s the case to show common(共) interest was pursued but public(公) was not because of the value difference between the Government and Opposition party. Under the deliberation bill, public-common interest is not “recognized” but “decided” But indispensable condition of “decision” is deliberation, which should be made through enough time and discussion on the whole House.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 세월호 관련법 이전 주요 재난관련 법률의 국회입법 과정
Ⅲ. 이른바 세월호 특별법의 여 · 야 합의와 개별 국회의원의 법률안 숙의
Ⅳ. 입법제안: 전원위원회를 통한 숙의 법률안 분리 처리
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002822791