메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김판기 (충북대학교) 홍진희 (충북대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제25권 제4집 통권 제48집
발행연도
2014.11
수록면
33 - 50 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
If a couple is divorced, they have to organize the property aspects as well as the identity relation. The Civil Code provide that the property achieved by cooperation during the marriage life could be liquidated. However, there are the several discussions the extent to which will be the subject of division of property in divorce.
We think that this is a significant judgment because this covered the surrender value of insurance contract and division of property in divorce, not subject of division of property in divorce discussed already. We think, nevertheless, there is a problems in the concluding of this judgment at a number of respects.
This judgment include the surrender value of insurance contact paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce. But, we wonder where we can include the surrender value of insurance contract paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce, in recognition that the plaintiff contributed to keep the insurance contract by do domestic labor directly and indirectly only from the disposition of property.
In this thesis we examined the general of division of property in divorce and the legal nature of surrender value. And then we discussed whether the surrender value of insurance contract can be the subjects of division of property in divorce.
It is not advisable to terminate the insurance contract easily and then divide the surrender value of insurance contract when a couple is divorce. Therefore we should not include the surrender value of insurance contact paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce. That is not reasonable, especially when one of a couple had paid the premium before the marriage or when other relatives have paid the premium substitutingly. This judgment have a problem in respect that it included the surrender value of insurance contact paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce. So we think the part of this judgment needs to amend in Supreme Court.

목차

Ⅰ. 사실관계
Ⅱ. 법원의 판단
Ⅲ. 판례평석
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002822640