개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.87 No.5
- 발행연도
- 2014.10
- 수록면
- 260 - 264 (5page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: The conventional treatment for postlaparotomy wound dehiscence usually involves surgical revision. Recently, vacuum-assisted closure has been successfully used in postlaparotomy wound dehiscence. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcome of 207 patients undergoing vacuum-assisted closure therapy or conventional treatment for postlaparotomy wound dehiscence.
Methods: Two hundred and seven consecutive patients underwent treatment for postlaparotomy wound dehiscence: vacuum-assisted closure therapy (January 2007 through August 2012, n = 25) or conventional treatment (January 2001 through August 2012, n = 182).
Results: The failure rate to first-line treatment with vacuum-assisted closure and conventional treatment were 0% and 14.3%, respectively (P = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in the enterocutaneous fistulas and hospital stay after vacuum-assisted closure therapy or conventional treatment respectively.
Conclusion: Our findings support that vacuum-assisted closure therapy is a safe and reliable option in postlaparotomy wound dehiscence with very low failure rate in surgical revision compared with conventional treatment.
Methods: Two hundred and seven consecutive patients underwent treatment for postlaparotomy wound dehiscence: vacuum-assisted closure therapy (January 2007 through August 2012, n = 25) or conventional treatment (January 2001 through August 2012, n = 182).
Results: The failure rate to first-line treatment with vacuum-assisted closure and conventional treatment were 0% and 14.3%, respectively (P = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in the enterocutaneous fistulas and hospital stay after vacuum-assisted closure therapy or conventional treatment respectively.
Conclusion: Our findings support that vacuum-assisted closure therapy is a safe and reliable option in postlaparotomy wound dehiscence with very low failure rate in surgical revision compared with conventional treatment.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Gislason H. / 1995 / Bur st abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations : comparison of three closure techniques / Eur J Surg 161 : 349 ~ 354
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Haddad V. / 1980 / Abdominal wound dehiscence and evisceration : contributing factors and improved mortality / Am Surg 46 : 508 ~ 513
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Poole GV Jr. / 1985 / Mechanical factors in ab domi nal wound closure : the prevention of fa s cial dehiscence / Surgery 97 : 631 ~ 640
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Penninckx FM. / 1979 / Abdominal wound dehiscence in gastroenterological surgery / Ann Surg 189 : 345 ~ 352
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Riou JP. / 1992 / Factors influencing wound dehiscence / Am J Surg 163 : 324 ~ 330
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Haddad V. / 1980 / Abdominal wound dehiscence and evisceration : contributing factors and improved mortality / Am Surg 46 : 508 ~ 513
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Poole GV Jr. / 1985 / Mechanical factors in ab domi nal wound closure : the prevention of fa s cial dehiscence / Surgery 97 : 631 ~ 640
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Penninckx FM. / 1979 / Abdominal wound dehiscence in gastroenterological surgery / Ann Surg 189 : 345 ~ 352
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Riou JP. / 1992 / Factors influencing wound dehiscence / Am J Surg 163 : 324 ~ 330
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-510-002852164