지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
2016
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyze the different functions and suggest grammatically correct usage by looking at the characteristics of the following conjugated forms of ノダ(noda) which are “するのか(surunoka),” “するの?(suruno),“ and ”する?(suru).“
The main functions of “するのか(surunoka),” “するの?(suruno),“ and ”する?(suru)“ are 《疑い(utagai)》,《質問(sitsumon)》and 《確認(kakunin)》. The first distinguishable element in comparing these three functions used for “するのか(surunoka),” “するの?(suruno),“ and ”する?(suru)“ is intonation. It is pinpointed on how the sentence-ending particle ”の“ functions differently according to the intonation. Second differentiating element focuses on functional characteristics of such words.
As a result of analyzing, it was found that 《疑い(interrogative)》shows difference in functions between the usage in a monologue and a dialogue, 《質問(question)》 shows difference in meaning according to true-false interrogative, optional interrogative, and supplementary interrogative. How the listener related awareness and the preceding context differenciated the meaning of 《確認(confirmation)》.
The main functions of “するのか(surunoka),” “するの?(suruno),“ and ”する?(suru)“ are 《疑い(utagai)》,《質問(sitsumon)》and 《確認(kakunin)》. The first distinguishable element in comparing these three functions used for “するのか(surunoka),” “するの?(suruno),“ and ”する?(suru)“ is intonation. It is pinpointed on how the sentence-ending particle ”の“ functions differently according to the intonation. Second differentiating element focuses on functional characteristics of such words.
As a result of analyzing, it was found that 《疑い(interrogative)》shows difference in functions between the usage in a monologue and a dialogue, 《質問(question)》 shows difference in meaning according to true-false interrogative, optional interrogative, and supplementary interrogative. How the listener related awareness and the preceding context differenciated the meaning of 《確認(confirmation)》.
목차
Abstract
1. 연구목적
2. 선행연구의 고찰
3. 연구범위 및 방법
4.「するのか」·「するの?」·「する?」의 형태
5.「ノダ」기능 정의
6.「するのか」·「するの?」·「する?」에 대한 기능 분석
7.「するのか」·「するの?」·「する」의 변별
8. 결론
참고문헌
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-700-002899369