지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper was intended to investigate the difference in the referential number agreement between Korean pronouns and reflexives. It was postulated that the difference is dependent on the fact that unlike Korean reflexives, Korean pronouns have a number feature. One major point to be noticed in this paper is that Korean pronouns such as ku "he" and ku-tul "they" include their antecedents only by number agreement. More specifically, ku is a structurally or semantically singular NP, requiring a single entity as its referent, while ku-tul "they" is a structurally or semantically plural NP requesting more than a single entity. Another major point which is worth emphasizing is that caki "self" and caki-casin "self-self" are linked to antecedents by either the number agreement or number disagreement. Put differently, their referents can consist of either one entity or more than one entity. Finally and perhaps most importantly, the difference in the referential number agreement between pronouns and anaphors can be accounted for by the fact that pronouns have their own perfect number features, whereas Korean reflexives do not. This fact leads to the hypothesis that the referents of "caki" and "caki-casin" consist of one entity or more than one entity since they are semantically uncountable NPs.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Agreement and Disagreement of Reference
3. Quantifiers and Referential number Agreement
4. The Referential Number Distinction between Pronouns and Anaphors: The Reason why they are different?
5. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-700-002701084