메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정욱재 (한국영상대학교)
저널정보
한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제93호
발행연도
2014.9
수록면
93 - 126 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Analyzed here is how the Confucian scholars viewed and understood the concepts of “the Public” and “the Private”(公私), during the latter half period of Joseon through the concept of ‘Public Virtue(“Gongdeok, 公德”).’ The concept of this “Public Virtue” first appeared in Korean history seemingly thanks to the Chinese Confucian philosopher Liang Chi-Chao(梁啓超). Public Virtue, according to Liang, was a kind of shared virtue among citizens, needed for establishing a state, and a concept that symbolized the system of act and awareness beneficial for the groups, societies and state. Later, the Renewed Confucians like Park Eun-sik and Jang Ji-yeon actively adopted and circulated Liang’s ideology and publications, spreading the terminology of ‘Public Virtue.’
Renewed Confucians understood the concept of Public Virtue as ideas and acts that would benefit the group, societies and state, instead of individuals. Yet they also added their political and social ideals to that original concept of Public Virtue. Some of the Renewed Confucians perceived the concept of Public Virtue through the traditional Confucian concept system, viewing the ‘Virtue’ as vital order for the modern state and societies’ benefaction and progresses. In the meantime, a small group of Renewed Confucians who turned Pro-Japanese understood the Virtue just as public order or manners that people should follow. The meaning of Public Virtue was understood quite differently, according to stances.
In short, in the early 20th century, the concept of Public Virtue symbolized an idealistic system for acts and awareness that would benefact the public area, such as state, ethnicity and societies, and was regarded as an essential component for the progress of state, ethnicity, societies and groups. For the Renewed Confucians, Public Virtue was not only the diagnostic criteria for the past and present, but also an essential quality the civilians must demonstrate in various public areas. Therefore, in an analysis of the concept of “the Public and the Private(公私),” it can be concluded that the terminology ‘Public Virtue’ is a Confucian expression of modern ‘Public(公)’ that came from the Confucian scholars of Chosun.

목차

머리말
1. 유림의 분화와 ‘공덕(公德)’의 용어 출현
2. ‘공덕’의 함의와 ‘공’ 담론의 변화
맺음말
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-002725184